Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread Martin Cooper
"David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Why not just go to RC1 instead of beta 2? The problem is that some methods need to be removed before 1.0 Final. If the next milestone is RC1, then the methods need to be removed immediately, otherwise it's not a true rel

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread David Graham
Why not just go to RC1 instead of beta 2? On a related topic, it looks like Validator has cleared all the bugs for a 1.0.2 release. I think we could release Struts 1.1 RC2 before any final releases of FileUpload and Validator just to see what bugs (if any) get reported on those components. Th

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread Martin Cooper
"Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > If we can swat these two, we might be able to roll out RC2. I've been somewhat absent from here for a while, primarily because I'm working on getting FileUpload into shape. In the process of addressing a couple of issue

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
Ted Husted wrote: OK, we're back down to two. =:0) http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17562 Cedric, I can't quite follow the thread on this one myself. Does it look like Redding's patch would help (at least for now). Lavy seems to say it doesn't work for him. I have to do som

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread Arron Bates
[...cut...] > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18066 > > Arron (or Antoni). Does it seem like there would be an easy patch > here? Would specifying the type be a reasonable workaround? -- at > least until we can fix it properly in the next iteration. > > If we can swat these tw

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-18 Thread Ted Husted
OK, we're back down to two. =:0) http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17562 Cedric, I can't quite follow the thread on this one myself. Does it look like Redding's patch would help (at least for now). Lavy seems to say it doesn't work for him. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/sho

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-17 Thread David Graham
RC2 From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:36:54 -0500 Would this be RC2 of Final? .V Ted Husted wrote: I'll update the plan

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-17 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Would this be RC2 of Final? .V Ted Husted wrote: I'll update the plan and website later, but for now, the outstanding RC1->RC2 list stands at five tickets [NOT RESOLVED, NOT CLOSED, STRUTS, NOT UNKNOWN]. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_st

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-17 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
Whaoou ... 3 tickets for tiles on 5 left ;-). I have mark one as duplicate, change a second as an enhancement, and still need to solve the 3rd. I will do it asap. Now, there is only 3 tickets remaining. Cedric Ted Husted wrote: I'll update the plan and website later, but for now, the outst

Re: [STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-16 Thread Ted Husted
I'll update the plan and website later, but for now, the outstanding RC1->RC2 list stands at five tickets [NOT RESOLVED, NOT CLOSED, STRUTS, NOT UNKNOWN]. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFI

[STP] RC1 Release Plan

2003-03-16 Thread Ted Husted
I'm going to make run at the bug list and update the Release Plan, as we did for b3. -T. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]