--- Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > --- Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>BTW, there's about five ways to submit code here. Would you prefer an
>
> >>email attachment, a bugzilla ticket, or some other way?
> >
> >
> > Bugzilla with attached cvs diff
David Graham wrote:
--- Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, there's about five ways to submit code here. Would you prefer an
email attachment, a bugzilla ticket, or some other way?
Bugzilla with attached cvs diff -u formatted patches.
But, this is new stuff, nothing to diff...
Greg
--
--- Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The next step might be to try and integrate something like Struts
> > Workflow and/or Tiles into the RequestProcessor chain and see what the
>
> > various Chains look like.
>
> I get about a day every three weeks to look at this, but Tiles is what
The next step might be to try and integrate something like Struts
Workflow and/or Tiles into the RequestProcessor chain and see what the
various Chains look like.
I get about a day every three weeks to look at this, but Tiles is what
I'm working on. I'll share early and often.
BTW, there's abo
Ok, thanks for the clarification. So you're not suggesting that the
branching thing was a wholesale bad idea that should never be used. You
just prefer the "state checking" method for validation. I'm cool with that.
Greg
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
I'm sorry to bring back
Greg Reddin wrote:
If this is the case, how are we any better off with this model than we
were with a monolithic request processor? Why should the commands have
so much inter-dependence now that they are separate objects? Are we
better off with them as inter-dependent separate objects than we
Greg Reddin wrote:
I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out
already, but there's something I still don't understand...
I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be
executed rather than executing a "sub-chain" based on some condition.
I can see the corre
I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already,
but there's something I still don't understand...
I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed
rather than executing a "sub-chain" based on some condition. I can see
the correlation of the sub-ch
