DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:54:49 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Germuska wrote:
Perhaps this is understood, but I'm assuming that we also want to
say that the RM owns the release tags for the release he or she
is managing, and only the RM should *ever* move the tags?
Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Germuska wrote:
Perhaps this is understood, but I'm assuming that we also want to say
that the RM owns the release tags for the release he or she is
managing, and only the RM should *ever* move the tags?
It's never been
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Joe Germuska wrote:
Perhaps this is understood, but I'm assuming that we also want to say
that the RM owns the release tags for the release he or she is
managing, and only the RM should *ever* move the tags?
It's never been stated as such, but that's not a bad idea at
Thanks for fixing that. But there is still a problem.
(Nightly Build 2004/02/25)
You can see the error in the struts-example web application.
There is a staticJavascript.jsp page with this content
%@ page language=java %
%-- set document type to Javascript (addresses a bug in Netscape
according
At 7:23 PM +0100 2/25/04, Ralph Schaer wrote:
Thanks for fixing that. But there is still a problem.
(Nightly Build 2004/02/25)
You can see the error in the struts-example web application.
Hm. I don't believe that that's been changed in any of the last few revisions.
Please file this in Bugzilla;
this bug was introduced with revision 1.45 from 2004/02/04
in JavascriptValidatorTag.java
you find the working code in revision 1.44.
method renderJavascript.
StringBuffer results = new StringBuffer();
ModuleConfig config =
TagUtils.getInstance().getModuleConfig(pageContext);
I almost didn't read this thread, based on the subject line, but I'm
rather glad that I did, given how far the subject has strayed...
There is still a need for a freeze after tagging. While it's not quite as
essential as with our previous release process, it's still important.
Here's why.
The
At 9:08 PM +0100 2/25/04, Ralph Schaer wrote:
this bug was introduced with revision 1.45 from 2004/02/04
in JavascriptValidatorTag.java
OK; that makes sense. But that was when I was trying to get it to
throw an exception when there was no such form instead of just
spewing the static javascript
So, at least as long as folks are happy with me as the RM, please allow me
the leeway of a short freeze period between tagging and releasing the
build, so that I can do the job as best I can. I don't think that should
be too onerous.
Fair enough: being RM is a lot of work, I'm sure, and we should
Hm. No one brought that up when we were talking about implementing
the fix, but that explains the old default behavior, which was to
render the javascript without wrapping script tags. That makes sense
when you're rending javascript for external use.
It seems to me that the solution would be
Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 02:03 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: Re: Bug in JavascriptValidatorTag
Hm. No one brought that up when we were talking about implementing
the fix, but that explains the old default behavior
At 6:28 PM + 2/24/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once a release is tagged that's it. We could retag and do 1.2.1,
however there will probably be other things that need to be fixed.
The point is to get 1.2.0 out the door and then see about making
whatever fixes that need to happen.
Well, if it's
Yes, under the current process, there little reason to have a real freeze. It's more
like a heads-up now.
AFAIC, the codebase should not be considered frozen now, and people can start applying
fixes to go into 1.2.1, including the license thing.
The only reason we're not starting a vote on the
I've found a bug in JavascriptValidatorTag.java.
(Nightly build 2004/02/23)
I use this tag in one of my jsp pages:
html:javascript dynamicJavascript=false staticJavascript=true/
Now the JavascriptValidatorTag crashes with this error message:
javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: No form found under name
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16653.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 21, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21560] - JavascriptValidatorTag creates
invalida javascript method name when validating using action path in
formName
I was working
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21560] - JavascriptValidatorTag creates
invalida javascript method name when validating using action path in
formName
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16653.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16653.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
26 matches
Mail list logo
