RE: BUG #13520

2002-10-14 Thread Martin Cooper
-Original Message- From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 7:07 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: BUG #13520 smack-head/ This is why I asked :-) I was tired and trying to kill bugs ;-) hehe ... 's OK. It's dead now

RE: BUG #13520

2002-10-13 Thread Martin Cooper
, October 11, 2002 10:00 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: BUG #13520 Is this just a usage question, or am I wrong? I'm tempted to mark it INVALID with an explaination that Bugzilla is for reporting aberrant behavior - not asking how the digester works. Looking for guidance

RE: BUG #13520

2002-10-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:26:07 -0700 From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BUG #13520 It seems to me that the Validator plugin should

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13520] - Use of Digester

2002-10-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13520. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13520] - Use of Digester

2002-10-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13520. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: BUG #13520

2002-10-13 Thread Eddie Bush
] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BUG #13520 It seems to me that the Validator plugin should be using the same mechanism as ActionServlet. However, someone more class loader savvy than I am (e.g. Craig :) may want to weigh in on this. Makes sense to me that we implement

BUG #13520

2002-10-12 Thread Eddie Bush
Is this just a usage question, or am I wrong? I'm tempted to mark it INVALID with an explaination that Bugzilla is for reporting aberrant behavior - not asking how the digester works. Looking for guidance! http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13520 -- Eddie Bush -- To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13520] New: - Use of Digester

2002-10-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13520. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.