Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put in place for the final release only?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:51:22 -0800
Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put in place for the final release only?
Mark
Yes, but let me ask that another way then. Are Struts
final releases newly built for that purpose, or do they
consist of the last release candidate that has been
through community testing and then is relabeled as
the final release when everyone is satisfied with it?
Mark
At 09:13 AM
Mark Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put in place for the final release only?
There isn't a usual way. ;-) With the Struts
: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:46:24 -0800
Mark Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it usual in Struts for a release candidate to come
out with the final dependency versions for community testing,
or will these be put in place
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:59:28 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
I don't think we need an RC that just updates
I've removed Commons Resources from the build, and also from the Gump
descriptor, and updated the docs so that they no longer refer to this
component. Struts no longer has any Commons Sandbox dependencies. :-)
--
Martin Cooper
Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
:59:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:09:10 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
So dbcp, pool, and fileupload still need work. Arron
I think that the just released commons-net 1.0 has taken over from
jakarta-oro.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
snip/
jakarta-oro
PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:17:21 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:09:10 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts
think that the just released commons-net 1.0 has taken over from
jakarta-oro.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
snip/
jakarta-oro
red-face victim=me /
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dependent Packages in Struts 1.1
No. Jakarta ORO is a text processing package that Validator
uses for its regular
Martin Cooper wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the topic comes up regularly, it strikes me that we haven't had any
formal discussions or decisions on what versions of our dependent packages
to include in Struts 1.1 final. Most of them are
Yes. Since announcing the Beta, there has been an uptick in user activity,
so there are a number of bugs that need to be addressed. Unfortunately,
FileUpload seems to be a one man show (me) at the moment, with the
original
contributors being conspicuously absent.
It looks like there are 2
15 matches
Mail list logo
