Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

specification would need to be enhanced to conveniently support >this case ? > >Petr > >- Original Message - >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 6:57 AM >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources > &

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

think the J2EE specification would need to be enhanced to conveniently support this case ? Petr - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 6:57 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources > Personally, I am firml

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

le. > > > > Using multiple configuration files allows me to > have one config file for the > > common framework, and then one more for each > product. Each product team can > > concentrate on its own config file, and the > installer and uninstaller only &g

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

les to add or remove, and not about what they > contain or how to modify them. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > - Original Message - > From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 4:29 PM > S

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

October 13, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources > It seems there has been some discussion in the past > about a new config file DTD that would support having > "multiples" so that individuals could work on a > particular section without affecting others. It see

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 2:58 AM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources > Can we join this with the idea of having multiple Struts configuration > files, or, on a related front, multiple workflow configuration f

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

It seems there has been some discussion in the past about a new config file DTD that would support having "multiples" so that individuals could work on a particular section without affecting others. It seems there is also the camp that would rather just have the servlet read multiple config files

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Can we join this with the idea of having multiple Struts configuration files, or, on a related front, multiple workflow configuration files? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The Struts 1.1 TODO list contains the following item: > > "XmlMessageResources. Implementation of MessageResources and > Mess

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ah. Thanks for letting me know. I guess I was on hiatus when that happened > in Commons. ;-) I'd better go take a look at what's there. I'm a Commons > committer also, so I should be able to commit to the sandbox. > You are, and you can. :-) >

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

In my opinion, one of the biggest benefits is that you can do all sorts of things with standard XML tools. For example, the message resources could be used as input to XSLT for various things, or as output from it. One idea I had in mind was translation tools. Imagine if you started with a "ma

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Ah. Thanks for letting me know. I guess I was on hiatus when that happened in Commons. ;-) I'd better go take a look at what's there. I'm a Commons committer also, so I should be able to commit to the sandbox. -- Martin Cooper At 09:12 AM 10/11/01, SCHACHTER,MICHAEL (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote:

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, SCHACHTER,MICHAEL (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:12:15 -0400 > From: "SCHACHTER,MICHAEL (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'&qu

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Martin, In the jakarta-commons-sandbox, there's a folder called "resources" containing Struts MessageResources and some other classes that I was working on, but had to put off for a while. It seemed before that MessageResources were being factored out of Struts and into jakarta-commons, and if t

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Young, Wayne writes: > What are some benefits of using XMLMessageResources over standard > property files? Improved buzzword-compliance? -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Title: RE: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources What are some benefits of using XMLMessageResources over standard property files? Wayne Young -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [PROPOSAL] XMLMessageResources

Looks good. In fact I myself had an interest in writing just this functionality and have just been too busy with the Console to take on any "Core" development work. -james --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The Struts 1.1 TODO list contains the following > item: > > "XmlMessageResources. Implemen