- Original Message -
From: Jonas Björnerstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Bean philosophy
Having just switched from Perl to Java web development, perhaps I am missing
something fundamental. Being new to the forum, I
In a Been, you can use a Hashtable to save your attributes,
but you don't have to use a Hashtable. I normaly don't.
Because I know which attributes to expect, I implement these
as fields in the Bean, and save the values in these. I know
that a Hashtable has an expected constant-time on the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bean philosophy
I wanted to crank out a prototype of something and
didn't want to make all of the setter/getter methods
so I modified PropertyUtils to handle java.util.Map.
I posted some source
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bean philosophy
I wanted to crank out a prototype of something and
didn't want to make all of the setter/getter methods
so I modified PropertyUtils to handle java.util.Map.
I posted some source
.
Taylor
- Original Message -
From: Jonas Bjornerstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: Bean philosophy
Although you get basic type conversion with the getter/setter methods, it
is
not a convincing argument. The price you pay
Dynamic properties are a very very very heavily requested feature, and
will undoubtedly be addressed early in the Struts 1.1 development
cycle. Supporting them elegantly is more than just a couple of tweaks
here and there, so we want to make sure that we've got all the bases
covered with
Subject: Re: Bean philosophy
Jonas Bjornerstedt wrote:
I see little reason (yet) why the ActionForm should be modeled as such.
I think the keyword here is yet. Much of the underlying Struts designs
are based on trends and patterns that have yet to reach their logical
conclusion
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jonathan Asbell wrote:
Craig, that was the most excellent explanation.
Thanks.
What currently IS available
for use regarding the automatic properties, and how may I use them? I
download the nightly builds ;^
There's nothing in the official builds at the moment --
-
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Bean philosophy
Jonas Bjornerstedt wrote:
I see little reason (yet) why the ActionForm should be modeled as such.
I think the keyword here is yet. Much of the underlying Struts
