sure the
suggestions
are relevant to the current state of the tags.
David
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar
Developers List
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for
Calendar Popup tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the
tags as they
currently exist.
The best thing to do is to open a bugzilla enhancement
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was:
Suggestions for
Calendar Popup tag lib?)
Like this
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag() and doEndTag()
for many tags. My pattern has been to have a render*
From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag()
and doEndTag() for many tags. My pattern has been to have
a
--- Paananen, Tero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag()
and
A good way to tackle this is Use Case by Use Case, to avoid talking in
general terms.
+1 There's no way to factor the tags properly without a specific use case
to guide us.
David
1) What specific tags have you or do you want to modify the behaviour
of.
2) What level of granularity makes
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags as they
currently exist.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions
to the current state of the tags.
David
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar Popup
tag lib?)
Well, this is the thing
Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replyied Inline.
Paananen, Tero wrote:
[this is in response to Robert Leland's reply to my
post on the struts-user list griping about the
(un)extensibility of custom tags]
My #1 pet peeve about custom taglibs
I agree *iff* we're careful about the way it's done. Some of the method
calls will probably go away anyway if the code is automatically inlined,
so
I don't believe method invocation would be the issue.
However, looking at FormTag right now, I see several methods that build
up
strings in
: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:00 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar Popup
tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags
12 matches
Mail list logo
