Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
I will be providing mechanisms equal to the isUserInRole(), getRemoteUser(),
and getUserPrincipal(). But these objects will be context-session specific
Faking the values returned by these methods is pretty easy
], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Security Solution
Greetings Michael,
I don't believe it has to be struts specific. But, I have never used it
anywhere but struts. There many other features I would like to add to it.
Specifically an ldap realm for authorization and perhaps add some hooks
don't even know if it
is possible.
One thing to note. Because a webapp has limited access to the server scope
this security solution is context specific for now. This is why I want to
add some of the afformentioned hooks. I also imagine it would be possible to
store the security xml file so
. Do to my EJB ignorance I don't even know if
it
is possible.
One thing to note. Because a webapp has limited access to the server scope
this security solution is context specific for now. This is why I want to
add some of the afformentioned hooks. I also imagine it would be possible
to
store
Greetings,
I wanted to offer some code if anyone is interested. I have seen many
discuss security on archives and wanted to offer an alternative to container
managed security.
I spent some time weighing out whether to use container managed security or
not and came to the conclusion that I would
Please post and/or send 1 copy to me. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Phase Web and Multimedia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts User [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Struts Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:49 AM
Subject: Security Solution
Greetings,
I wanted
Hello Brandon,
This might be interesting to me, but then I'm a newbie so I'm not sure
whether I should be interested.
As an alternative to posting sources here, you could create a project on
SourceForge.net. It would relieve this list of the specific traffic.
One aspect of documentation
