s close as
> possible).
>
> Edgar
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:06 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: T
-Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 01:00
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for
> Calendar Popup tag lib?)
>
>
> --- Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar Popup
tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags as they
> currently exist.
The best thing to do is to open a bugzilla enhancement request with
*specific* tags and met
Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:00 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestions for Calendar Popup
tag lib?)
--- Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly some of
> I agree *iff* we're careful about the way it's done. Some of the method
> calls will probably go away anyway if the code is automatically inlined,
> so
> I don't believe method invocation would be the issue.
>
> However, looking at FormTag right now, I see several methods that build
> up
> strin
"Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Replyied Inline.
>
> Paananen, Tero wrote:
>
> >[this is in response to Robert Leland's reply to my
> > post on the struts-user list griping about the
> > (un)extensibility of custom tags]
> >
> >
> >
> >>>My #1 pet peev
evant to the current state of the tags.
David
>
> Edgar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Suggestio
Exactly some of the problems I have been having with the tags as they
currently exist.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Paananen, Tero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:42 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Tags more extensible (was: Sugge
> I agree totally, at the level were currenrly arguing,
> I dare anyone to disagree !
>
> A good way to tackle this is Use Case by Use Case, to
> avoid talking in general terms.
>
> 1) What specific tags have you or do you want to modify the
> behaviour of.
Well, this is the thing...how would I
> A good way to tackle this is Use Case by Use Case, to avoid talking in
> general terms.
+1 There's no way to factor the tags properly without a specific use case
to guide us.
David
> 1) What specific tags have you or do you want to modify the behaviour
> of.
> 2) What level of granularity ma
--- "Paananen, Tero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
> > > implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
> > > entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
> >
> > I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag()
> > From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
> > implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
> > entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
>
> I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag()
> and doEndTag() for many tags. My pattern has been to
> From what I've seen most custom tags seem to have been
> implemented as one big doStartTag() or doEndTag(). The
> entire implementation of the tag is in that one method.
I have worked to move most of the code out of doStartTag() and doEndTag()
for many tags. My pattern has been to have a "rende
13 matches
Mail list logo
