Re: cvs commit:jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ImageTag.java

2001-09-23 Thread Ted Husted
I'm thinking that we've been saying the tags are HTML 4.01 compliant, and then using that as a rationale for not including some proprietary attributes. So if we've missed any of the attributes in the W3C spec, then I'd say that would be a bug (breaks our contract). But, if we did something like

Re: cvs commit:jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ImageTag.java

2001-09-23 Thread martin . cooper
I have no problem with applying this to 1.0.1 if you think that's the right thing to do. To be honest, I wasn't sure whether to treat this (and similar "missing attribute" reports) as a bug or a feature request. :-} -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTEC