Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
For future reference,
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?StrutsMoreAboutJSF
-T.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First and most important, thanks for addressing the concerns!
It's fine line threaded here with lots of gray area.
I will study (legalize), and maybe respond my opinion as to what I
think of it, but there are things not addressed at the first glance such
as that there are more than one thing
Vic, my friend,
You're really not getting this.
JSTL is not a replacement for Struts. Nor JSF is a replacement for
Struts. They are both technologies that you can use with Struts and get
more bang for your development buck.
Some people are saying that with a really good implementation of JSF,
Ted Husted wrote:
Some people are saying that with a really good implementation of JSF,
you might [not] need Struts.
^
:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
, June 07, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
Vic, my friend,
You're really not getting this.
JSTL is not a replacement for Struts. Nor JSF is a
replacement for
Struts. They are both technologies that you can use
Not every Java developer is willing to simply accept whatever technology
Sun or the JCP brings out.
If we were, there wouldn't be Velocity and Tapestry and Turbine and
Maverick and WebWorks and JPublish, and quite a few others.
But, regardless of what happens next, just as dinosaurs live on as
I see it spun as replacement to Struts:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-userm=105467147713194w=2
Above says:
the upcoming EA4 release of JavaServer Faces includes some pretty
dramatic improvements in the C part of the equation
So ... more of a replacement, I comprehended (Struts is View
Vic, you're making no sense at all.
Craig said,
I don't view Struts as dying -- after all, it is a stable, mature,
platform for web application development that can be used today, while
JavaServer Faces is still in Early Access and cannot be employed in
production apps. And, you can use
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies Struts _should_ integrate to Sun JSF, I
do not like it.
This is quite different than JSTL, which was an Apache License.
Maybe there should
I don't understand the problem you have with Struts integrating with JSF.
JSF is the Java *standard* web GUI library.
David
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies Struts _should_
.
If
David Graham wrote:
I don't understand the problem you have with Struts integrating with
JSF. JSF is the Java *standard* web GUI library.
David
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies
Struts takes no part of Sun JSF.
If
David Graham wrote:
I don't understand the problem you have with Struts integrating with JSF.
JSF is the Java *standard* web GUI library.
David
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly
important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies Struts _should_ integrate to Sun
JSF, I do not like it.
This is quite different than JSTL, which was an Apache License.
Maybe there should be integrations posted in cvs apache
integrating with
JSF. JSF is the Java *standard* web GUI library.
David
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies Struts _should_ integrate to Sun JSF, I
do not like it.
This is quite
*standard* web GUI library.
David
(hope this does not detract from more important issues)
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
To the extent that this implies Struts _should_ integrate to Sun
JSF, I do not like it.
This is quite different than JSTL, which was an Apache
Vic,
The JSF Expert group includes :
Specification Lead
Ed Burns Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Craig R. McClanahanSun Microsystems, Inc.
Expert Group
Aligo, Inc. Apache Software Foundation
BEA Systems Bayern, Shawn
Bergsten, Hans Berkovitz, Joseph
Is ASF allowed to distribute Sun JDK? Not AFAIK.
I think main argument is license, ex: what is cost of JSF? Is it
similar to JBoss issue?
I am not against JSF integration w/Struts at all. The more the better.
When there is only a single choice, this can't be good, standard or not.
No one has
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:20:26 -0400
From: Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces
(hope this does
Isn't JSF just another spec like Servlets and JSP?...
Any vendor can make a JSP impl based on the spec, so they should also be able
to make a JSF impl. Struts-Faces allows Struts to play with any compliant JSF
implementation. If it doesn't we get to go Craig-bashing. :)
Struts plays with
19 matches
Mail list logo
