After some deep thought...
(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
It all sounds quite ok as to what it is you're trying to do. I do think
that an efficient routing of the link interaction through JavaScript is
a good thing. It is a very viewy thing people want to do.
Looking at it from the end
Arron,
Let me preface this email with the understanding that I developed this about
2 months ago and am using it on a site now. So, I haven't thought about it
for a while and so my memory of it might be presumptuous in some areas
(sigh! I wish my mind were a computer). Notes are mingled with
: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
After some deep thought...
(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
It all sounds quite ok as to what it is you're trying to do. I do think
that an efficient routing of the link interaction through JavaScript is
a good thing. It is a very viewy thing
Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
From: Jose Quinteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
After some deep thought...
(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
What's HHGTTG not familiar with that one. :-)
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Deep thought
good point
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before
adding
/ Fax 202-463-4863
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the
door
Correct. :)
Arron.
Struts-dev Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) wrote:
Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
From: Jose Quinteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
After some deep thought...
(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
What's HHGTTG not familiar
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before
adding lots of new functionaltiy ...
Not a problem.
One of the things I learned, in watching the development of JSTL, is that
tags with lots and lots of optional attributes, and different operating
modes, can be really
