On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam Hardy
I provide URL validation on a page which saves links for
users.
I put together the latest build of commons-validator (1.1.2) and struts
(1.2) to see what the URL validation is like.
The class for server-side validation is in place
validation on a page which saves links for
users.
I put together the latest build of commons-validator (1.1.2) and
struts
(1.2) to see what the URL validation is like.
The class for server-side validation is in place, but the javascript
doesn't exist.
It works very strictly, too
From: Adam Hardy
I provide URL validation on a page which saves links for
users.
I put together the latest build of commons-validator (1.1.2) and struts
(1.2) to see what the URL validation is like.
The class for server-side validation is in place, but the javascript
doesn't exist
/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Client-side validation with multi-form page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
This is fixed in the Nightly build of Validator as of March 9th.
It may take a few days for the nightly build of Struts to
start using this version, and so it's client side validation
will be broken until that point.
I'm picking up the most recent changes for tonight's nightly build
OK sorry.
No I haven't tried it - I only use server side validation. I was just
following a message on the user list, found myself reading that bug and saw
your note asking for a reminder after 1.2 was out - so I sent you one.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26639
Multipart request parameters lost after validation failure
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-29 14:00 ---
Turns out that this is not directly related to 26675, which was a simple bug in the
conversion of the
RequestProcessor functionality
/show_bug.cgi?id=27317
Server-side validation not called when validate=true
Summary: Server-side validation not called when validate=true
Product: Struts
Version: Nightly Build
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=27317
Server-side validation not called when validate=true
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
=false
validate=true
forward
name=validationFailed
path=/editPerson.do
redirect=false
/
forward
name=edit
path=.personDetail
redirect=false
/
/action
When I click on a button to save my form, the validation kicks
the validationFailed forward) and it solved my problem.
If you're reading these - thanks for putting up with me. ;0)
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:56 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Validation working, but not stopping
-Original Message-
From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:56 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Validation working, but not stopping action from processing
I'm using the 1.2.0 test build on Windows XP.
I have the following XDoclet-generated
), and when the
null pointer exception occurs in your method (when you attempt to report
a validation error), it will cause some difficult-to-diagnose errors
higher up the stack.
For a bit more insight into the nullness of the 'errors' variable, look
at the initValidator() method in the Resources class
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Enhancement
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.0 Family
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-18 00:31 ---
Ted,
You changed this to RESOLVED/FIXED, but the patch hasn't been applied yet -
just wondering if you forgot to apply or didn't yet intend
/show_bug.cgi?id=26486
enhance required and other validation actions for form reuse
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-15 19:31 ---
Is there any reason why ValidatorActionForm and DynaValidatorActionForm don't serve
this purpose?
They look up validator forms
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-13 12:01 ---
I know you are right and I did have a quick look at doing that hoping to copy
an existing struts validator test - but unfortunately there arn't any
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-12 13:59 ---
Thanks for your comments.
Niall, I am hitting
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-12 17:00 ---
Garima,
You need to close this bug and mark
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-13 02:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=10347)
Change validate methods to return boolean rather than object
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
Summary: Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain
request scope attributes when
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-11 23:17 ---
Is your input path an Action? Routing
/show_bug.cgi?id=26873
Validation error in DynaValidatorForm does not maintain request scope attributes when
forwarding to the page defined in the input attribute of ActionMapping
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-11 23:39 ---
Garima,
When you say Now I hit submit
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=26639
Multipart request parameters lost after validation failure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Normal |Enhancement
/show_bug.cgi?id=26639
Multipart request parameters lost after validation failure
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-11 04:03 ---
See also #26675.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=26639
Multipart request parameters lost after validation failure
Summary: Multipart request parameters lost after validation
failure
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Other
Status
/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Client-side validation with multi-form page
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-03 18:20 ---
Thanks Matt,
I have applied this patch locally but since it requires a change
to both struts and Validator to work, I can't commit it just yet.
If I apply
/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Client-side validation with multi-form page
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-02 16:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=10184)
Update to patch latest version (1.44) of JavascriptValidatorTag.java
/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Client-side validation with multi-form page
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-02 16:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10185)
Patch the javascript in individual .js files in Commons Validator instead of in
validator-rules.xml in struts
/show_bug.cgi?id=26486
enhance required and other validation actions for form reuse
Summary: enhance required and other validation actions for form
reuse
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: Other
URL: http
/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-27 09:43 ---
Please confirm that the problem exists against the nightly build.
If the problem persists, please also provide a patch that implements the
proposed
/show_bug.cgi?id=26151
Optionally specify patterns for byte, short, int, long, float, double validation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=26151
Optionally specify patterns for byte, short, int, long, float, double validation
Summary: Optionally specify patterns for byte, short, int, long,
float, double validation
Product: Struts
Version: Nightly Build
Platform
/show_bug.cgi?id=26151
Optionally specify patterns for byte, short, int, long, float, double validation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
/show_bug.cgi?id=19161
validateDate javascript validation doesn't handle non-strict date parsing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO
/show_bug.cgi?id=19161
validateDate javascript validation doesn't handle non-strict date parsing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|struts
/show_bug.cgi?id=16810
Javascript Date validation for datePattern not supported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=16249
localized float validation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Keywords
/show_bug.cgi?id=25421
[VALIDATOR] radio button validation with javascritp
Summary: [VALIDATOR] radio button validation with javascritp
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=25421
multiple radio button javascript validation broken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[VALIDATOR] radio button|multiple radio button
/show_bug.cgi?id=25421
multiple radio button javascript validation broken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:09 ---
Yes, checkbox makes more sense in this case. For a single radio button, it's
just more a matter of convience. Say, my jsp is supposed
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:27 ---
You should never be rendering only a single radio button because it's a huge
usability issue. The user can never uncheck a single radio
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:55 ---
Yes, if it can be replaced by a select box. But here is a situation:
Template is required to proceed in the application. A template has
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:27
---
You should never be rendering only a single radio button because it's a
huge
usability issue. The user can never uncheck a single radio button once
they've
checked it. In this case, you should probably be using a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:27
---
You should never be rendering only a single radio button because it's
a
huge
usability issue. The user can never uncheck a single radio button
once
they've
checked it. In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having horrible visions of someone doing a query driven voting
application using radio boxes...
AHA! So *that* is how the old communist regimes always got 99.9%
positive votes in their elections ... :-)
Craig
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-29 15:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=8803)
A Patch file for fixing bug24202 - single radio button and checkbox js validation
problem
/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
Summary: Javascript validation fails for single radio and single
checkbox
Product: Struts
Version: Nightly Build
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
/show_bug.cgi?id=16810
Javascript Date validation for datePattern not supported
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-26 16:31 ---
Actually, I can't validate dates whether I put in a date pattern or not. If I
don't put in a lt;vargt; section for datePattern then the variable
/show_bug.cgi?id=16810
Javascript Date validation for datePattern not supported
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-26 16:41 ---
Sorry, didn't mean to put in the dependency on 22384.
-
To unsubscribe, e
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
This bug depends on bug 11520, which changed state:
What|Old Value |New Value
Status
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords
/show_bug.cgi?id=12776
validation order is incorrect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional Comments From
/show_bug.cgi?id=16810
Javascript Date validation for datePattern not supported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-17 03:22 ---
I am modifying the struts-validator example app so I can test these out
/show_bug.cgi?id=23179
No javascript required validation for multiples checkboxes and multiple selection
dropdown list
Summary: No javascript required validation for multiples
checkboxes and multiple selection dropdown list
Product: Struts
Version
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|required JavaScript |Add
/show_bug.cgi?id=23179
No javascript required validation for multiples checkboxes and multiple selection
dropdown list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=18993
Add required JavaScript validation for multiple selects and checkboxes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
the property name that's being converted from inside my
converter. Of course I'd need this information to do the aforementioned.
I think there should be no separation of validation and type conversion, I
can't see why they shouldn't be done together. Should BeanUtils be extended
to cater
ActionErrors so I can render this generically. But it seems there'
s
no way of accessing the property name that's being converted from inside
my
converter. Of course I'd need this information to do the aforementioned.
I think there should be no separation of validation and type conversion, I
can't see why
/show_bug.cgi?id=22687
Indexed Property Validation - javascript non-javascript
Summary: Indexed Property Validation - javascript non-
javascript
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1RC2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=22687
Indexed Property Validation - javascript non-javascript
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-25 16:19 ---
There seems to have been some work on allowing the validation to continue with
an extension to the validation.dtd, but that is not the heart of my
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-18 16:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=7874)
I added a int[] pages field with getter, setter, and containsPage methods
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-18 16:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=7875)
Class uses new containsPage method in Field to check the page
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-18 16:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=7876)
Added pages attribute to the field element
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-18 16:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=7878)
Added call to Field.containsPage() to check if the page exists in the fields
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-18 17:12 ---
The above attachments are my proposal for adding this new functionality of
pages instead of page on fields:
7874: Field.java
I added an int[] pages field
/show_bug.cgi?id=15912
Client-side validation fails if not all form-fields are specified on page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=22476
Javascript validation fails with two forms on one page.
Summary: Javascript validation fails with two forms on one page.
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=22476
Javascript validation fails with two forms on one page.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=20432
Validator returns nulls in JavaScript validation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Add time validation
Summary: Add time validation
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: Validator
/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Add time validation
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-14 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=7825)
Time JavaScript validation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Add time validation
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-14 16:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=7826)
Time Java validation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
Summary: page attribute in the Validation Config file
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
/show_bug.cgi?id=22145
page attribute in the Validation Config file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Normal |Enhancement
/show_bug.cgi?id=21760
Add support for non-default resource bundles in validation
Summary: Add support for non-default resource bundles in
validation
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status
/show_bug.cgi?id=21760
Add support for non-default resource bundles in validation
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-21 08:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=7414)
validator framework files to add alternate bundle support
/show_bug.cgi?id=21760
Add support for non-default resource bundles in validation
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-21 08:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=7416)
extra bundles for validator example webapp
/show_bug.cgi?id=21599
validation problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
I'm trying to validate a collection of objects such
that one of the properties generated html inputs looks
like:
input type=text name=assignmentForm[1].startDate
size=13 value=
I've defined the form-validation doc with the
following field block:
field property=startDate depends=date
msg
/show_bug.cgi?id=21599
validation problem
Summary: validation problem
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: Example
/show_bug.cgi?id=21509
password fields are not subject to the Javascript minLength, maxLength mask
validation rules
Summary: password fields are not subject to the Javascript
minLength, maxLength mask validation rules
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1
/show_bug.cgi?id=21509
password fields are not subject to the Javascript minLength, maxLength mask
validation rules
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Other
/show_bug.cgi?id=21509
password fields are not subject to the Javascript minLength, maxLength mask
validation rules
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/ and validation ...
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 02:01 PM, David Graham wrote:
Struts doesn't have the luxury of living in one development shop. I
understand your need for customizations for your particular conventions
but we can't force them on others. So, we'll be ok as long
David - thanks for adding your thoughts to the issue. Now some more of
my thoughts to Jonathan's message...
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 12:36 AM, DeRose Jonathan wrote:
1) Putting an '*' into a label for required fields assumes people want
an
'*', maybe they want a '(R)' or maybe they
,
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:41 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: A Custom tag using bean:message / and validation ...
Even if its not added to Struts (and there is a reason not to - it
relies
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
