DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11074.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11051.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:06 PM
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11074] New: - bean:include docs state internal
dispatch but that's not true
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH
I'm trying to upgrade to last night's nightly build.
In tiles-documentation.war (the only tiles webapp I saw) the following
is no longer applicable:
controller
processorClass=org.apache.struts.tiles.TilesRequestProcessor /
Is this true?
Please confirm.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
in, and will be
available in nightly build 20020723 of Struts. The only difference is
that you need to call:
DynaActionForm requestForm =
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass(requestForm).newInstance();
instead of the previously quoted method name, for consistency with
previous method signatures
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 07:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NPE when setting values on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11074.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11089.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I have a simple form on my jsp page. In my ActionForm class I validate whether a
checkbox was clicked or not. If the checkbox was not clicked an error is returned and
displayed on the same jsp-page. This works fine but:
Some (not all!) of the properties which were given by the user are not
It is true.
I have updated the documentation in cvs, but jakarta site doesn't
reflect it ;-(. I think that Jakarta site is not automatically updated.
However, the documentation from struts-documentation.war should shows
the new syntax:
In each struts-config.xml:
plug-in
Your form is probably in the request scope. If you put your form in the
session scope, then your fields will remain.
The problem is that the form is destroyed and recreated with the fields that
you posted. Instead of putting lists (for selects) in the form, populate
them every time in the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11093.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:53:20 +0200
From: Cedric Dumoulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tiles as a Plug-In
It is true.
I have updated the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-23 16:51 ---
This occurs once more in the nightly build 20020723.
If there is a workaround, please let me know.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
- Original Message -
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: Struts-EL: Ideas about name and indexed name attributes?
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig I've been thinking about this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am using Struts and Weblogic 6/7 without any problems. I deploy my apps as
EAR files using the weblogic.deploy tool via Ant. The whole
build/deploy/test cycle is fairly slow and has me dreaming of .NET or a
decent laptop, but you do avoid the whole serializability problem that
occurs when you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Any hints for fixing this in the nightly build? I'd like to fix it
myself, rather than waiting for tonight's build.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10534
Thanks,
Matt
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
Yep, saw that.
To override that method, then, do I have to subclass both ActionServlet (to
override getRequestProcessor()) and subclass RequestProcessor too? I thought
all this made it easier to plug stuff in? ;-)
Or am I missing something...?
Cheers,
David
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL
dhay == dhay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dhay Yep, saw that.
dhay To override that method, then, do I have to subclass both ActionServlet (to
dhay override getRequestProcessor()) and subclass RequestProcessor too? I thought
dhay all this made it easier to plug stuff in? ;-)
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:18:35 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: upgrading to 1.1 nightly
Yep, saw that.
To override that method,
Subject: Announce: JSTL (Standard Tags) + Struts (MVC) live web Demo
From: Vic C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
If you are starting a Java Web, you should use MVC and Standard tags,
this kit is a sample of best (at least good) practices.
It is MVC (Struts/Tiles)+JSTL +XSLT+ DAO (Open Source Data
Cool. Where can I find documentation on the new format for struts-config.xml /
controller info?
Thanks,
David
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/23/2002
04:51:19 PM
Please respond to Struts Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List
[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry - found struts-config dtd!!!
Cheers,
David
David_Hay/Lex/Lexmark.LEXMARK@sweeper.lex.lexmark.com on 07/23/2002 06:07:52
PM
Please respond to Struts Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: David Hay/Lex/Lexmark)
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 18:07:52 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: upgrading to 1.1 nightly
Cool. Where can I find documentation on the
Jing == Jing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jing The convention (see JSTL spec 2.2.1) is to use the name var for attributes
Jing that export information. As I do not think html-el:text/ should do any
Jing export
Jing things, we could simplify Craig's example as follows:
craigmcc2002/07/23 17:30:24
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java
Log:
Add a new servlet initialization parameter rulesets for ActionServlet,
that allows you to specify a comma-delimited list of fully qualified class
names of
craigmcc2002/07/23 17:47:23
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java
Log:
Pass a SAX InputSource, with a system identifier, to the Digester used to
parse struts-config.xml files. This allows struts-config.xml to use relative
references to other XML files
Well that's kinda interesting. ;-)
Since the use of custom additions to the config file will cause validation
against the DTD to fail, should we deliberately turn off validation if this
option is being used (i.e. ignore the value of the 'validating' init param
and always treat it as false)?
--
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 17:46:20 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9198.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jholmes 2002/07/23 19:25:53
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
bring up to date
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +7 -2 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file:
craigmcc2002/07/23 22:06:05
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action Action.java
Added: src/share/org/apache/struts Globals.java
Log:
Migrate global manifest constants to a new class (org.apache.struts.Globals)
that has no other content, so they can be referenced
Well, I do have one idea, off the top of my head. It's a bit whacky, but in
a perverse kind of way, it fits with what Stxx is all about. I'm not
entirely sure it meets the Stxx folks' goals, though.
The idea is to allow for Struts to apply a transform to the config file
before passing it to the
craigmcc2002/07/23 22:28:05
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/config DataSourceConfig.java
MessageResourcesConfig.java
Log:
Remove the
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:14:06 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
45 matches
Mail list logo
