Re: Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread Rob Leland
David cygwin will fo all you need, here is the line I use : ssh -L 2401:localhost:2401 -l rleland -N cvs.apache.org which is in a bat file. in wincvs: CVSROOT : rleland@localhost:/home/cvs authentication: "passwd file" on local host. I use to use MindTerm until they became a full blown commerci

RE: Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread Martin Cooper
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Help getting remote CVS set up > > > Thanks for voting me in as a committer. I'm sure it will be > worthwhile. So am I. :-) > > No

Re: Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread Eddie Bush
Tip (under Unix systems anyway): Use '&' to put a process in the background and return your command prompt. % < I'm assuming this is what your prompt looks like :-) It could be a $ or [user@machine directory] $ % ssh -l dmkarr -C -L 2401:localhost:2401 cvs.apache.org & That would free yo

Re: Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 20 Sep 2002, David M. Karr wrote: > Date: 20 Sep 2002 19:33:29 -0700 > From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Help getting remote CVS set up > > Thanks for voting me in as a committer. I'm sure it wil

Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread David M. Karr
Thanks for voting me in as a committer. I'm sure it will be worthwhile. Now, I could use a little help getting my remote CVS set up. I'm using Cygwin, on Win2k. Does anyone else here use that environment, and know how to properly set this up? I tried doing a normal ssh login to cvs.apache.org

RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-20 Thread Byrne, Steven
I think the behavior of whether to terminate field level checking on the first field failure should be controllable. For my company's application, it is important to show all the failures for a given field, so the user knows that not only is the field required, but it's a telephone number field w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12884] New: - Multipart/form-data post doesn't process URL parameters

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: proposal to extend RequestProcessor

2002-09-20 Thread David Graham
Why do you want ServletFilter capability in the struts ActionServlet (other than not using a servlet 2.3 compliant container)? I personally think this is best left in the ServletFilter realm and people using older containers (myself included) can subclass RequestProcessor. In general, I don't

RE: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer

2002-09-20 Thread James Mitchell
What the heck +1 for me too ;) James Mitchell Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network" http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta > -Original Message- > From: Palamadai Sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 1

RE: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer

2002-09-20 Thread Palamadai Sriram
+1 -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer I'd like to propose David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer on Struts. It's clear fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12871] - ExceptionHandler does not obey controller inputForward rule

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12872] New: - ForwardAction doesn't play nice with Declarative Exception Handling

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12871] New: - ExceptionHandler does not obey controller inputForward rule

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: proposal to extend RequestProcessor

2002-09-20 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:27 AM -0400 2002/09/20, Michael C. Han wrote: >Currently, in order to have preprocessing of a request, we must extend >RequestProcessor each time. I think it will be beneficial to create >mechanism similar to the PlugIns. This'll give us the ability to perform >operations like authenticati

proposal to extend RequestProcessor

2002-09-20 Thread Michael C. Han
Currently, in order to have preprocessing of a request, we must extend RequestProcessor each time. I think it will be beneficial to create mechanism similar to the PlugIns. This'll give us the ability to perform operations like authentication checks and etc. It'll give us a ServletFilter like c

RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-20 Thread Andres Marcel (KASO 211)
James, +1 is the right way to go. Let the user immedately know, what was wrong. Don't give the information part by part. Marcel I definitely agree with both: - The validation process should first iterate through all fields and then, for each field, iterate through its scpecific validation r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12819] - org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of private properties

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12819] - org.apache.struts.util.AppException should have protected properties instead of private properties

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util AppException.java

2002-09-20 Thread rleland
rleland 2002/09/20 07:25:24 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util AppException.java Log: Make private member protected and add constructor for arrays. This make it consistent with ActionMessage interface, and ActionError. I Smell an interface here :-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12861] New: - URL address changed when I use path-mapping on servlet

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12859] New: - Can't start on Novell 5 with jvm1.3.1_01

2002-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: VOTE: Behavior of Validator

2002-09-20 Thread phpsurf
+1 definitely I definitely agree with both: - The validation process should first iterate through all fields and then, for each field, iterate through its scpecific validation rules. - The validation process can stop (for each field) at the first unvalidated rule, but it should not stop at the fi