Re: [FRIDAY] Re: Struts taglib

2002-11-02 Thread V. Cekvenich
Don't forget about backwards compatibility ... :-) Of course this could take years. As you said, and I silently applauded: bean and logic tags could be deprecated to jstl html tag could be deprecated in future to faces tag That leaves action mappings. Those relay should make it to a future

RE: DynaActionFormClass

2002-11-02 Thread edgar
What I think he wants to do is write a program which introspecs his database metadata and on the fly write dynaforms. Edgar -Original Message- From: Karr, David [mailto:david.karr;attws.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:24 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename Application componentsto Module

2002-11-02 Thread Rob Leland
The 3 methods are A) superclassing B) superclassing modified B) delegation. In thinking over superclassing vs delegation, I realized superclassing, if used in a modified form isn't so bad. However straight superclassing presents real design problems with inconsistent states between

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

2002-11-02 Thread dmkarr
dmkarr 2002/11/02 20:24:50 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Log: In the documentation for all styleClass elements, I added a parenthesized statement 'renders a class attribute'. All the styleId attributes already indicated they render an id attribute. At the same

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14071] - Need clear info on which Struts attributes produce specific HTML attributes

2002-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14071. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.