ok, this one sentence in ted's post caught my eye:
I rarely write custom Actions any more.
whoah. how is this possible? most of our web pages represent some sort of
database operation: displaying, creating, updating, or deleting. i can see
how you can minimize the amount of code that would
Can anyone point me to the apis for dynaforms (beans)
fs
-Original Message-
From: Andre Beskrowni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:48 AM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms)
ok, this one sentence in ted's post
The Tomcat plugin is quite useful as well. I'm using the SolarEclipse
plugin for jsp and xml formatting but it's still in the early stages of
development. I like the DBEdit plugin for viewing databases.
This is a good site for finding Eclipse plugins:
dynabeans:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/beanutils/api/org/apache/commons/beanutils
/package-summary.html
dynaforms:
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/org/apache/struts/action/package-summar
y.html
-Original Message-
From: Satterwhite, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I think you meant to say JNI instead of JNDI calls to the OS. It's a bit
misleading to say it's fast as hell on Windows without mentioning that it
runs on Linux as well.
SWT is what Swing should have been. Native calls for OS supported widgets,
java imitations for other widgets.
Dave
Yes Sir, you are correct as Mr Karr also pointed out.
I'll be committing the complete tutorial later today or first thing tomorrow.
So don't worry about changing it for now.
As I'm hammering through these screenshots, I hate to think that I will single
handedly increase the documentation by 2
I don't think it's illegal to display screenshots of their product in this
context. We're not getting any money for this :-).
David
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: bloated
[ posted to struts-user but i just realized struts-dev might be a better
place for this]
Hi there,
I'm trying to create a form with some pre-filled which either come from a
cookie or a database. i browsed the archive and found a comment from Craig
where he says the best way to do this is by
Thomas Heller wrote:
[ posted to struts-user but i just realized struts-dev might be a better
place for this]
... actually, it's a struts-user question.
Hi there,
I'm trying to create a form with some pre-filled which either come from a
cookie or a database. i browsed the archive and found
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14730.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The best way to go about this is by creating an enhancement request in
bugzilla and attaching a patch to it, not just code. I think your idea is
interesting though :-).
David
From: Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Thomas Heller wrote:
[ posted to struts-user but i just realized struts-dev might be a better
place for this]
Hi there,
I'm trying to create a form with some pre-filled which either come from a
cookie or a database. i browsed the archive and found a comment from
Hi; I'm looking at the v1.0.2 ActionServlet's addServletMapping() method,
and I'm noticing that it only handles the case where the ActionServlet has
one servlet mapping associated with it. But it's legal (is it not?) to
establish several servlet mappings for a Servlet under the 2.2 spec, right?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:08:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pre-populated ActionForms / suggestion [patch] for
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nelson, Laird wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:18:16 -0500
From: Nelson, Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: servletMapping field in ActionServlet (1.0.2)
Hi; I'm looking at the
I have settled on Struts as my application framework, assuming that there
will continue to major shifts in the future (like the shift to 1.1 has
been, which I like). However, I have not decided on the scripting
language, if that is what you want to call it, viz. JSP vs. Velocity or
some other
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Struts currently does not know how to reliably compute
URLs for things like html:form in the face of more
than one mapping.
OK.
A subtle point needs to be remembered -- from the client
viewpoint, the URL you
Hi,
I agree with Eddie and Martin that this is probably not a good idea, but
for a different reason -- it would violate the layering of the MVC model.
Remember that form beans are part of the View tier. Adding a prepare()
method for the purposes you propose would typically involve
I believe the Velocity site has a comparison to JSP. Of course, they like
Velocity better. If it's important that new developers be productive
immediately I would go with JSP because that's a java standard that they
will already know.
David
From: micael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
One thing that should be considered is not a technical issue. It's
clear that the number of JSP developers is much larger than Velocity
developers. That doesn't mean JSP is better than Velocity, but it
means that people and training will be more portable when using JSP.
Assuming that same
-Original Message-
From: Nelson, Laird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK. So not even an extra optional attribute on the form tag
somewhere (Use
servletPath X instead of servletPath Y), bearing in mind the
limitations of
our current reporting requirements?
Following up my own
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nelson, Laird wrote:
[snip]
There is not going to be a useful workaround for this -- it's
fundamental
to the nature of the architecture.
OK. So not even an extra optional attribute on the form tag somewhere (Use
servletPath X instead of servletPath Y), bearing in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14780.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Karr, David wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:08:49 -0800
From: Karr, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Velocity vs. JSP: objective tests?
One thing that should be
11/22/2002 1:14:45 PM, micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have settled on Struts as my application framework, assuming
that there will continue to major shifts in the future (like the
shift to 1.1 has been, which I like). However, I have not
decided on the scripting language, if that is what you
The idea behind a Struts Action is that it suppose to give you a
place to call your business logic components. Rather than call
various business processes through a subclass, I continue the
decorator pattern by declaring the process to call as part of the
ActionMapping.
I then use a standard
David said:
I believe the Velocity site has a comparison to JSP. Of course, they like
Velocity better. If it's important that new developers be productive
immediately I would go with JSP because that's a java standard that they
will already know.
also, if you haven't already, be sure you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14780.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig said:
...
For example, here's a simple little loop example in
Velocity syntax and a couple approaches in JSP:
Velocity:
(Note -- it's assumed that the Customer collection has been stored in the
VelocityContext by some preceding business logic.)
actually, if you are using
11/22/2002 1:26:45 PM, Nelson, Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is my company unique in trying to do
things this way?
Probably not, but Struts hasn't been trying to be all things to
all people. =:0)
It does what the people working on it need it to do, and if it
doesn't do what we need, then we
Hi,
That's not an important question but does the Struts logo was final ? ... if no, what
about
organize a Struts Logo Competition like other Jakarta project ;)
-emmanuel
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français
See comments below...
yeah, no offense intended to David Johnson, but that's a
really poor way to use Velocity. it looks as though that
method is intended to spit out some HTML hardcoded into
whatever $macros is or some such thing. the HTML shouldn't
come from the java, it should be in
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:12:19 -0800
From: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Velocity vs. JSP: objective tests?
Craig said:
...
For
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Emmanuel Boudrant wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:30:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts logo
Hi,
That's not an important question but does the Struts logo
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:38:02 -0700
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Velocity vs. JSP: objective tests?
See
I've always found it amusing that people are worried about page authors
totally screwing up the application by executing arbitrary code. Who are
these rogue page authors you're hiring that will destroy your app?
We can't pass anything but a value bean with read only properties to this
idiot
+1
I've always thought the logo could be a bit flashier. How would we pick the
winner? A vote by the committers?
David
From: Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts logo
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:30:53
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:55:55 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Velocity vs. JSP: objective tests?
I've always found it amusing that people are
Matt said:
See comments below...
yeah, no offense intended to David Johnson, but that's a
really poor way to use Velocity. it looks as though that
method is intended to spit out some HTML hardcoded into
whatever $macros is or some such thing. the HTML shouldn't
come from the java, it
Craig said:
...
Sorry ... I was following an example from a published article (don't
remember where) so I presume that it (at least) *used* to be correct :-0.
yeah, it may have been right (or closer) once, but not since at least two
years ago (when i started using velocity).
...
*
David Graham wrote:
I've always found it amusing that people are worried about page
authors totally screwing up the application by executing arbitrary
code. Who are these rogue page authors you're hiring that will
destroy your app?
What if, for example, you have an e-Commerce catalog and
JSP wouldn't be an option anyways because ordinary users wouldn't understand
it. The vast majority of situations are not like the one you describe.
David
From: Dave Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Velocity vs.
David Graham wrote:
JSP wouldn't be an option anyways because ordinary users wouldn't
understand it. The vast majority of situations are not like the one
you describe.
You are correct. More imporantly, if you are choosing
between JSP and Velocity as your Struts View technology
then the
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Nathan Bubna wrote:
[big snip]
#showNavBar( true)
Fine ... still looks like a scriptlet to me :-).
looks can be deceiving! with a proper velocimacro, the HTML isn't
hard-coded into java classes. that may not be important to some folks, but
it is to me.
No offence taken, but I do have some comments, which are below...
yeah, no offense intended to David Johnson, but that's a
really poor way to use Velocity. it looks as though that
method is intended to spit out some HTML hardcoded into
whatever $macros is or some such thing. the HTML
Dave said:
No offence taken, but I do have some comments, which are below...
yeah, no offense intended to David Johnson, but that's a
really poor way to use Velocity. it looks as though that
method is intended to spit out some HTML hardcoded into
whatever $macros is or some such thing. the
+1 from me. I'm not an artist by any stretch of the imagination, so I
won't be entering any proposals, but I'll sure enjoy seeing the results.
Neither am I, but here's a few
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta/images/new-logos/
I prefer the last one, but we might have a few legal issues
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
LOL, that last one was great.
Thanks,
David
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts logo
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:36:29 -0500
+1 from me. I'm not an artist by any stretch
rleland 2002/11/22 22:31:23
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic ForwardTag.java
Log:
Bug 13613 Make Forward Tag Module aware.
Reported and patched by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Bonanno)
Thanks !
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +10 -4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13613.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I agree but overall very original ;-}...
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:36 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Struts logo
+1 from me. I'm not an artist by any stretch of the imagination, so I
won't be
53 matches
Mail list logo
