RE: Avoid code reformating !

2002-12-16 Thread Andre Beskrowni
> > But, while we are talking about coding conventions, at least please > adopt closing if/for/while/etc blocks with curly brackets for > one-line > blocks. The Struts codebase is littered with non-curly-bracketed > one-line blocks and that in and of itself drives me nuts when > I'm trying t

RE: Action chaining

2002-12-12 Thread Andre Beskrowni
just for the record, i'm in complete agreement with erik on this issue. i can remember reading warnings about how chaining actions isn't clean design a long time ago. and for a while i heeded those warnings. but i eventually found myself using the exact same pattern that erik mentioned when he s

RE: Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms)

2002-11-22 Thread Andre Beskrowni
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:56 AM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms) > > > Can anyone point me to the apis for dynaforms (beans) > > fs > > -Original Message- > From: Andre Be

Custom Actions? (was RE: Benefits of Dynaforms)

2002-11-22 Thread Andre Beskrowni
ok, this one sentence in ted's post caught my eye: > I rarely write custom Actions any more. whoah. how is this possible? most of our web pages represent some sort of database operation: displaying, creating, updating, or deleting. i can see how you can minimize the amount of code that would

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8487] - Serializability issues inActionServlet/RequestProcessor

2002-06-07 Thread Andre Beskrowni
Is it possible that a committer could take a look at this bug? it's been languishing since late april and it's a pretty serious problem for anyone using weblogic (possibly others too). we'd like to be able to keep in synch with the nightly builds, but having to repeatedly add the changes in t

Re: Problems with multi-app config

2002-04-16 Thread Andre Beskrowni
extension mapping, and everything should >just work. (Path mapping will be supported when someone can figure out how >to make it work. :) > >-- >Martin Cooper > > >- Original Message - >From: "Andre Beskrowni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAI

Problems with multi-app config

2002-04-14 Thread Andre Beskrowni
i'm trying to get this feature to work, and i'm basically using past discussions from this group as documentation since i couldn't find any on the website. from what i understand, using multiple struts config files seems pretty damned simple. basically, if i wanted to use a struts config for

Problems with multi-app config

2002-04-14 Thread Andre Beskrowni
i'm trying to get this feature to work, and i'm basically using past discussions from this group as documentation since i couldn't find any on the website. from what i understand, using multiple struts config files seems pretty damned simple. basically, if i wanted to use a struts config for

RE: Declaritive Security Functionality

2002-04-14 Thread Andre Beskrowni
there is a simple way to do this using current struts capabilities, but part of it is a little bit of a hack... first, the struts dtd has a generic way of setting properties. you can use this in an action mapping as follows: to use this, you need to override ActionMapping so that it has a

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean DefineTag.java DefineTei.java LocalStrings.properties

2002-02-21 Thread Andre Beskrowni
i'm glad to see this was added. i've been using a similarly modified define tag for some time and have found it very convenient. thanks. ab > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

RE: declarative exception handling/resource bundle access

2002-02-04 Thread Andre Beskrowni
> -Original Message- > From: Dmitri Valdin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:18 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: declarative exception handling/resource bundle access > ... > > > and elegant, not to mention quite useful. ok, enough gushing...

RE: dynaforms & checkboxes - Use a Boolean instead of a boolean

2002-02-04 Thread Andre Beskrowni
i was using java.lang.Boolean. i was under the impression that primitive types weren't allowed (except as arrays). it seems your solution would work, but i'm hoping for a solution that won't require me subclass everytime i use a checkbox in a form. i think the best option would be to subclass F

RE: dynaforms & checkboxes

2002-02-04 Thread Andre Beskrowni
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:25 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: dynaforms & checkboxes > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Andre Beskrowni wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 1 F

RE: dynaforms & checkboxes

2002-02-04 Thread Andre Beskrowni
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:25 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: dynaforms & checkboxes > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Andre Beskrowni wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 1 F

dynaforms & checkboxes

2002-02-01 Thread Andre Beskrowni
i've been testing the dynaform stuff and i'm trying to use a checkbox element in my form with a default value of "true". (just for the sake of reference, the form property is called "booleanValue".) however, if i uncheck the checkbox and submit, the dynaform is always set to "true". i'm not sur

RE: declarative exception handling/resource bundle access

2002-02-01 Thread Andre Beskrowni
, you'd get a ClassCastException. ab -Original Message- From: Andre Beskrowni Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:36 AM To: 'Struts Developers List' Subject: declarative exception handling/resource bundle access so i finally got around to playing with the new exception ha

declarative exception handling/resource bundle access

2002-02-01 Thread Andre Beskrowni
so i finally got around to playing with the new exception handling features and it occurred to me that it would be really nice if you could specify the bundle that a resource is stored in. i don't think it would be too big of a headache to do this (simple change to ExceptionHandler, and an additi