We really try to support the specification rather than the browsers. For tags, we can
support the
specifications, period, since they are well enough defined.
Ideally, I'm sure we'd like to apply the same standard to JavaScript (or maybe
ECMAScript?), but there does tend
to be more gray space
ly a very small
> > number of people supporting older browsers though.
>
>The most likely place we'd run into browser version issues is
corporations
>which require the use of a specific browser by all employees. I suspect,
>though, that most companies have progressed at l
owsers.
But then there's always Opera, Lynx, et al, to think about.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "
[mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Supported Browsers] cvs commit:
jakarta-struts/src/share/org /apache/struts/taglib/html
JavascriptValidatorTag.java
I think someone just submitted a patch for xhmtl compliant taglibs.
Howeve
> I didn't remove the language attribute in case some browsers need it (I
> don't know of any though).
On that note, do we have an official list of supported browsers and/or
versions that we can actually test against? You know, for browser issues
(e.g. JavaScript, HTML tags, XHTML, etc, etc.)
So
