> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:32 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: LabelTag
> backwards compatibility in this way). The W3C spec for is the
> about the worst example
David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: LabelTag
>
>
> I think your suggestion on having one struts tag that emits any input type
> (like the html spec) is very flawed. Consider how hu
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: LabelTag
>Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:24:56 -0400
>
>I guess we have a difference of opinion.
>
>I care about the tld's because they take time getting them correct
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Edgar Dollin wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:24:56 -0400
> From: Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: L
10/15/2002 1:04:54 PM, Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Of course if this is obsolete, then my apologies for wasting everyone's time
>:-(.
Whether or not these tags become obsolete is a matter of whether anyone wants to
continue using and improving
them. Right now, a lot of people seem
built to handle the input html object.
Thanks for your commentary.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LabelTag
I think your suggestion on having one struts tag that emits any in
> I think XDoclet is cool, but the issue here is not extra tags -- it's
> extra attributes. One of our primary design principles is that Struts
> tags would only contain attributes that correspond to valid attribute
> names (for that particular element) in HTML/4.01 -- whether the browser
> ignor
er have to see the tlds.
Even without 2.3, it's trivial to put struts-*.tld files in your /WEB-INF
directory.
David
>From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Struts Developers List &
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Edgar Dollin wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:12:12 -0400
> From: Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Labe
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, edgar wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:10:32 -0400
> From: edgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sub
form
> to the spec.
>
> Now, if we could get XDoclet to handle that... ;-)
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Edgar Dollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:22 AM
>>To: 'Struts Deve
entries). If the struts tags were constructed in a
fashion which matched the html spec, then many of the issues with excess
tags would go away.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:43 AM
To: 'Struts Develope
Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: LabelTag
>
>
> The number of missing attributes in the tag libraries is
> large enough to
> consider
> a change, especially since writing tag libraries is one of the most
> pleasurable
> parts of what we do ;-).
>
> Edga
The number of missing attributes in the tag libraries is large enough to
consider
a change, especially since writing tag libraries is one of the most
pleasurable
parts of what we do ;-).
Edgar.
> I do highly encourage the Struts committers to use XDoclet for TLD and
> documentation generation (
edgar wrote:
> It would really be nice :-) to add object orientation to the tld as the
> amount of time spent debugging missing / incorrect tld's is larger than
> it should be. Also, the ability to specify default values would be nice
> as well.
>
> My idea would be something like
>
>
>
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: LabelTag
Ted Husted wrote:
> Maybe we could use this as the basis for a "how to extend taglibs" bit
> for the user guide.
Ted Husted wrote:
> Maybe we could use this as the basis for a "how to extend taglibs" bit for the user
>guide.
Yeah, except that my extension of MessageTag is only temporary, unless
we see a need to support all the other attributes.
Currently we only are using 'key', and thats the only one
Maybe we could use this as the basis for a "how to extend taglibs" bit for the user
guide.
-T.
10/15/2002 4:43:20 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jean-Noel Ribette wrote:
>> Erik,
>>
>> You might want to have a look at the struts-layout taglib hosted at
>> http://struts.applica
Jean-Noel Ribette wrote:
> Erik,
>
> You might want to have a look at the struts-layout taglib hosted at
> http://struts.application-servers.com
> This opens source library implements (nearly) all the functionality you
> described here, and much more !
Cool - I've looked at that library before
Martin Cooper wrote:
> I like the idea. I do see a couple of problems, however.
>
> * You are presumably defining the juxtaposition of the label, the colon, the
> asterisk, and the input field, in the tag itself. This, I think, would be
> rather specific to the layout you have in mind.
Yes. We
Erik,
You might want to have a look at the struts-layout taglib hosted at
http://struts.application-servers.com
This opens source library implements (nearly) all the functionality you
described here, and much more !
If you intend to share your code, I'm very interesting in the part checking
i
I like the idea. I do see a couple of problems, however.
* You are presumably defining the juxtaposition of the label, the colon, the
asterisk, and the input field, in the tag itself. This, I think, would be
rather specific to the layout you have in mind.
* The use of a trailing colon is very mu
22 matches
Mail list logo
