Re: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2?

2003-03-06 Thread Erik Hatcher
Just food for thought: How about using the OGNL expression language (www.ognl.org) rather than writing your own parser? WebWork, Tapestry, and certainly others, are using OGNL. (and the creator of it is a good friend of mine!) Erik On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 12:56 AM, James Turner

RE: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2?

2003-03-06 Thread David Graham
, just a generated class file? Dave From: James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2? Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:42:25 -0500 Actually, I

RE: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2?

2003-03-06 Thread James Turner
James, I haven't even been able to figure out requiredif! I think your feature is great but we need to show some discipline and maintain the 1.1 freeze. IMO, this should be a definite addition for 1.2. I can live with that, I can stick it in the nightly build after we finally ship

RE: My dilema: Much improved version of requiredif ready, 1.1 or 1.2?

2003-03-05 Thread James Turner
Actually, I realized just after I sent this that if I took the required part out and called it validwhen instead, you end up with a true general purpose validation tool! So that's the one I'm proposing. Basically, if you had a field lastName that was required if firstName was filled in, you say: