Validator enhancement request

2003-01-05 Thread Matt Raible
Currently the Validator creates error messages in the order of that fields are specified in validation.xml. I am using XDoclet to generate my forms, and the getter/setters in my form are in alphabetical order. I am also using XDoclet to generate validation.xml and therefore, the errors I receive

Re: Another bright idea, make indexed work with JSTL forEach and friends

2003-01-05 Thread V. Cekvenich
Craig wrote : I'm playing with more interesting ideas like using Jelly scripts (or JSP pages) as Actions so you don't have to write them in Java. If Actions, or anything goes XML (Jelly), or JSP, EL or generator (or sometimes design patterns) we lose OO. OO gives us productivity as Java is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11932] - (Message Resource is not multi-app aware) Multi-Resource not work in Multi-Appliction config environment

2003-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11932. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Another bright idea, make indexed work with JSTL forEach and friends

2003-01-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, V. Cekvenich wrote: Craig wrote : I'm playing with more interesting ideas like using Jelly scripts (or JSP pages) as Actions so you don't have to write them in Java. If Actions, or anything goes XML (Jelly), or JSP, EL or generator (or sometimes design patterns)

RE: New PMD and Checkstyle tasks

2003-01-05 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bill Chmura wrote: Sounds great... I've used checkstyle for a while now and it has done a good job for the most part. About the 9,000 errors it produced (maybe errors is not the right word) Yah - perhaps I should have said 'violations'. - a good many of them are

Re: Another bright idea, make indexed work with JSTL forEach and friends

2003-01-05 Thread V. Cekvenich
Oh. Yeah, tiles XML is OO. Thanks for the correction! .V Martin Cooper wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, V. Cekvenich wrote: Craig wrote : I'm playing with more interesting ideas like using Jelly scripts (or JSP pages) as Actions so you don't have to write them in Java. If Actions, or

DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass

2003-01-05 Thread Matt Raible
This used to work fine with 1.1b2, but now it's not even available: org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionFormClass .getDynaActionFormClass(messageForm).newInstance(); D:\source\onpoint\src\onpoint\com\onpoint\webapp\action\CourseCatalogAct ion.java:81: cannot resolve symbol symbol : method

BasicDataSource and 1.0

2003-01-05 Thread Ted Husted
Is there any reason why the Commons BasicDataSource 1.0 (Pool 1.1) shouldn't work with Struts 1.0? If I try swappingin it in, using the different properties as documented, my results come back null. I tried stepping thru, but there's a lot going on in there =:0) I also tried retrofitting the

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseHandlerTag.java

2003-01-05 Thread turner
turner 2003/01/04 17:44:08 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseHandlerTag.java Log: Couple of tweaks suggested by Martin C. Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +32 -12 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/BaseHandlerTag.java Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc volunteers.xml

2003-01-05 Thread turner
turner 2003/01/04 17:10:35 Modified:doc volunteers.xml Log: Introduce myself... Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +36 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/volunteers.xml Index: volunteers.xml === RCS file:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseHandlerTag.java

2003-01-05 Thread turner
turner 2003/01/04 16:50:08 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseHandlerTag.java Log: Enable JSTL forEach and forToken support with indexed=true HTML tags Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +64 -6

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15799] - Nested tags picks up wrong bean for values

2003-01-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15799. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Jelly actions (was Re: Another bright idea, make indexed workwith JSTL forEach and friends)

2003-01-05 Thread Ted Husted
Sounds like we're all on the same page here. =:0) I'm also looking at using the Jelly XLST for views as well (a la the Velocity View Tools). Martin Cooper wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Longer term (2.0 time frame probably), I'm playing with more interesting ideas

RE: New PMD and Checkstyle tasks

2003-01-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:32:25 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New PMD and Checkstyle tasks On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bill

RE: DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass

2003-01-05 Thread Matt Raible
Has it become as easy as: DynaActionForm myForm = new DynaActionForm(); ?? Man - that would be slick if (true)! Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass

2003-01-05 Thread Matt Smith
I am using this for 1.1.b3: FormBeanConfig cfg = mapping.getModuleConfig().findFormBeanConfig(mapping.getAttribute()); ActionForm form = null; if (cfg.getDynamic()) { form = (ActionForm)DynaActionFormClass.createDynaActionFormClass(cfg).newInstance() ; } else { form =

RE: DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass

2003-01-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Matt Raible wrote: Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:12:51 -0700 From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass Has it become as easy

RE: New PMD and Checkstyle tasks

2003-01-05 Thread Bill Chmura
I have not contributed any code directly to the Struts project, so I feel a little squimish about saying it - but I would put forth, humbly, that maybe just following the Jakarta (hence Sun) standards would be the best thing to aim for. I am sure that everyone would agree that having unused

Struts and JMX

2003-01-05 Thread Jerome Ernsberger
Hallo, do you think it make sense to use struts and JMX Thx Jerome -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts and JMX

2003-01-05 Thread David M. Karr
Jerome == Jerome Ernsberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jerome Hallo, Jerome do you think it make sense to use struts and JMX You'd be better off asking questions like this on the struts-user list. The answer depends on what you mean by that. I assume you ask whether they should be