New I18N Tag

2002-09-11 Thread David Graham
Hi, I think I'm finally ready to give something back to the struts community. I've developed a custom tag that displays a language select box in a form. When you select a new language the form is submitted and the tag updates the locale stored under Action.LOCALE_KEY. I think it's worth

Re: proposal to extend RequestProcessor

2002-09-20 Thread David Graham
Why do you want ServletFilter capability in the struts ActionServlet (other than not using a servlet 2.3 compliant container)? I personally think this is best left in the ServletFilter realm and people using older containers (myself included) can subclass RequestProcessor. In general, I

RE: Tomcat 4.1.x

2002-09-24 Thread David Graham
I think he already found his problem but yes I do have a better idea :-). You could just put a breakpoint before calling PropertyUtils and step through the struts code until the exception is thrown. Then you could inspect the variables surrounding that situation. Dave From: Taylor, Jason

Re: struts-config_1_1.dtd error?

2002-10-01 Thread David Graham
personally. I can't imagine the DTD being seen during app execution - I'm guessing you are opening it for reference. One observation I would make: Shouldn't we be using an encoding of UTF-8? I thought that was the way to go nowadays ... David Graham wrote: The struts-config_1_1.dtd file starts

RE: struts-config_1_1.dtd error?

2002-10-01 Thread David Graham
-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: struts-config_1_1.dtd error? Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:14:18 -0500 David Graham wrote: The struts-config_1_1.dtd file starts with this line: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? which I

Re: org.apache.struts.util.AppException implementing an Interface

2002-10-01 Thread David Graham
I don't think adding interfaces using hungarian notation (I prefix) is a very good idea. It decreases readability and makes the name nonsensical. It's especially not a good idea when none of the other interfaces used in struts have that notation. Dave From: phpsurf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MessagesTag Enhancements

2002-10-01 Thread David Graham
I think some enhancements to the MessagesTag are appropriate but before I started coding a patch I thought I would get some developer opinions. I think it should support message resources keys in the same way that the ErrorsTag does. Instead of errors.* it would support messages.header

RE: org.apache.struts.util.AppException implementing an Interface

2002-10-02 Thread David Graham
? -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: mardi 1 octobre 2002 20:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: org.apache.struts.util.AppException implementing an Interface I don't think adding interfaces using hungarian notation (I prefix) is a very good

Re: Faster View Components...

2002-10-02 Thread David Graham
Maybe the slowness is from the amount of data you're displaying. You could try doing it with scriptlets and see if you get any improvement but your jsp will be a mess. You could also try using the JSTL tags for looping. You're scaring me with this perl talk...I never want to go back to that

Re: Applying patches

2002-10-03 Thread David Graham
I agree! I stated this frustration earlier this week in an unrelated thread. I recently posted a suggestion to improve the MessagesTag to struts-dev and asked for comments. I received 0. I have submitted patches for documentation that have gone completely uncommitted and uncommented on.

Re: [OT] voting procedure

2002-10-04 Thread David Graham
I believe only committers can vote on who joins their club. If I were a committer I would vote for Eddie if only to irritate him by sending him my patches ;-). Dave From: Taylor, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL

[OT] RE: [Proposal] Sub-application inheritence

2002-10-08 Thread David Graham
Inheritance isn't evil, perhaps misused but not evil. For me, it comes down to the classic is-a vs. has-a question. It seems that you have to play find-the-implementation if you use composition as well. Dave From: Jon Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL

[OT]Re: [Proposal] Sub-application inheritence

2002-10-08 Thread David Graham
Interfaces allow you to have polymorphism just as well as inheritance does. So, one could not use inheritance at all and implement interfaces to acheive polymorphism. Dave From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL

Re: [commons-lang] What's up with NestableRuntimeException?

2002-10-08 Thread David Graham
Eddie, Why do you consider it bad to extend Object directly? You also said you prefer checked exceptions but I think that's missing the point of exception handling. A good article is here: http://www.javaworld.com/jw-07-1998/jw-07-techniques.html Not to be obvious but: RuntimeExceptions are

Re: [commons-lang] What's up with NestableRuntimeException?

2002-10-09 Thread David Graham
] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [commons-lang] What's up with NestableRuntimeException? Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:36:39 -0500 David Graham wrote: Eddie, Why do you consider it bad to extend Object directly? You also said you prefer checked exceptions but I think that's missing

RE: Basic Issues

2002-10-11 Thread David Graham
well is the strategy of classifying just about everything as business logic which must be provided by the back-end developer. That's all... -JT -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Basic

Re: bugzilla emails

2002-10-13 Thread David Graham
: Re: bugzilla emails Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Unfortunately, this heading is global to all Bugzilla emails on all Apache projects, so it can't be changed without quite a large population agreeing to it ;-(. Craig On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Sat, 12 Oct

bugzilla emails

2002-10-13 Thread David Graham
Is it possible to configure the bugzilla email subject line? The DO NOT REPLY part at the beginning prevents me from reading most of the important pieces of the subject line and people reply to these messages all the time anyways. It's not a huge deal, but if it can I be changed I would

RE: LabelTag

2002-10-15 Thread David Graham
I think your suggestion on having one struts tag that emits any input type (like the html spec) is very flawed. Consider how huge that one tag would be if it knew how to output text, textarea, radio, checkbox, submit, and password fields. Each of the struts input tags have features unique to

RE: LabelTag

2002-10-15 Thread David Graham
syntactic analysis would not be much larger. After all the browser has to be built to handle the input html object. Thanks for your commentary. Edgar -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

Re: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability

2002-10-15 Thread David Graham
Eddie, Can you take a look at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12309 It relates to tiles and 1.1. I'd like to get your thoughts on it. Sorry, this didn't really answer your question. Dave From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Future Release Suggestion

2002-10-15 Thread David Graham
I think the problem is that some very heavy hitters were added into 1.1. Validator, sub modules, map backed form attributes, tiles, RequestProcessor, Plugins, etc. are all new (AFAIK) to 1.1. This amount of change requires quite a while to accomplish. It may be beneficial in the future to

(struts1.1b2) redirect problem

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
with the contextPath. And in org.apache.util.RequestUtils.forwardURL there's nothing particular if the forward is redirected. I think that the problem become from there. Do you think I must add that in the bug list ? Or I'm not watching in the good way ? Iris David Graham wrote: Do any errors show

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12309] - ForwardAction should return an ActionForward.

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
Thanks Eddie! Dave From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12309] - ForwardAction should return an ActionForward. Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:56:04 -0500 Yes, sorry -

Re: [VOTE] David Graham as Struts Committer

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
Don't worry Eddie, I like you better than me anyway :-). Dave From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] David Graham as Struts Committer Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:04:54 -0400 +1

Re: [VOTE] How should Tiles be refactored?

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
Independent configuration files for 1.1, possible sharing in 1.2. So, I guess that's number 2. Dave From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] How should Tiles be refactored? Date: Wed,

RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
To me, validator and tiles are part of the core. Without them, struts loses much of its utility and importance. David From: Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL

RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:56:22 -0500 At 2:26 PM -0600 2002/10/16, David Graham wrote: To me, validator and tiles are part of the core. Without them, struts loses much of its utility and importance. I think that's a bit extreme. Action

template status

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
What's the deal with the struts template library? I haven't used it but it seems to have many features that Tiles has. Tiles seems more developed however. Are there any plans for template? Dave _ Broadband? Dial-up? Get

RE: template status

2002-10-16 Thread David Graham
release, with a view to supporting only Tiles in future releases. (Sorry, I didn't mean for this to turn into a history lesson. :) -- Martin Cooper -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

volunteers.xml not building?

2002-10-23 Thread David Graham
I modified volunteers.xml some time ago to include my info as a committer but it isn't reflected in volunteers.html. Is this file not included in the build? Dave _ Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.

Re: HTML formatting of newline characters with bean:write tag

2002-10-23 Thread David Graham
If this is a common problem, maybe we could add a method to Action like breakNewLines(String) that does this transformation. The bean:write tag should not do any transformation, just display what it's given. What do you think? Dave From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts

AppException

2002-10-23 Thread David Graham
From browsing the archives and looking at source code I'm still a bit confused about AppException. It seems like the only benefit it provides is to let you specify a message key and replacement values for the error message. Is that right? I'm concerned about application exceptions extending

Re: template status

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
Shouldn't we also deprecate the taglib code (ie. deprecate the classes and all their methods)? David From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: template status Date: Thu, 17 Oct

Re: Struts Roadmap

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
the original authors of the respective components. Steve -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability

RE: Struts Roadmap

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
the feeling of the developers about how frequently releases (at least of a particular level in the versioning hierarchy) will come out. Steve -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: Going to other context and/or server in 1.1

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
enough for users to do, and I don't think it would require too significant of a change to implement. This is one time I think startsWith criteria would suffice ;-) but I'm open to suggestions. David Graham wrote: Are you referring to this bug? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

RE: Going to other context and/or server in 1.1

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
to other context and/or server in 1.1 David Graham wrote: I thought of the http:// matching as well. Are there any cases when this logic wouldn't work? Hardcoding the protocol may be a bad idea. I don't like that idea either, but I can't think of a better approach. As I said, I'm open

RE: [VOTE] How should Tiles be refactored?How

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
Danny, Your comments are welcome on the list as long as they are respectful. Adding a PS. sorry if I offend anyone does not cut it here. In the future, please be more considerate to others. Thanks, David From: Trieu, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL

Patches Question

2002-10-18 Thread David Graham
When committing code to cvs, is it better to create a patch and apply it or edit the file and commit the whole thing? Thanks, Dave _ Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN!

RE: [Supported Browsers] cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java

2002-10-21 Thread David Graham
-struts/src/share/org /apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:57:11 -0700 -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Supported Browsers] cvs

RE: [Supported Browsers] cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java

2002-10-21 Thread David Graham
. --- - Nayan Hajratwala - Chikli Consulting LLC - http://www.chikli.com -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Supported Browsers] cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org /apache/struts

Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html

2002-10-22 Thread David Graham
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml attribute for the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, I think the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use the html:html tag so it doesn't make sense to require that to use xhtml. David

Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html

2002-10-22 Thread David Graham
2002 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT) On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:24:08 -0600 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html XML compliant HTML is XHTML

Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html

2002-10-22 Thread David Graham
Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:57:52 -0700 (PDT) On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:19:57 -0600 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html

2002-10-22 Thread David Graham
Oct 2002 18:46:26 -0700 (PDT) On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:54:14 -0600 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and html:html If we're not doing xhtml

Re: Resending Deploying in Jrun 3.0 - Please respond

2002-10-24 Thread David Graham
From the javadoc for NoSuchMethodError: Thrown if an application tries to call a specified method of a class (either static or instance), and that class no longer has a definition of that method. Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run time if the

Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
It struck me the other day that the validator could be further integrated into struts. I'm not sure about my ideas so I want to get your thoughts. Why should people need to subclass ValidatorActionForm instead of ActionForm to use the validator? What forms have you built that didn't need

Re: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
forwarded the discussion to you, David. It happened on the 23rd. David Graham wrote: It struck me the other day that the validator could be further integrated into struts. I'm not sure about my ideas so I want to get your thoughts. Why should people need to subclass ValidatorActionForm

Re: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
person) wanted to key on the action path rather than the action attribute. But if we were patch this to use a switch, mores the better. -Ted. 10/25/2002 10:34:52 AM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It struck me the other day that the validator could be further integrated into struts. I'm

Re: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
separate subclasses which vary only in how they key to validation rules is unnecessarily complex, but otherwise, what benefits do such a change bring? Joe At 11:42 AM -0600 2002/10/25, David Graham wrote: Thanks for the input Ted. I was only suggesting changing struts-config if validator

Re: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
too convenient. (A lesson Turbine learned the hard way.) -Ted. 10/25/2002 1:42:20 PM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the input Ted. I was only suggesting changing struts-config if validator was truely merged; I agree that optional components don't belong there. The validation

RE: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Validator Integration I'm mainly suggesting this to get some new ideas out there. I don't see how it would break backwards compatibility. As I stated earlier

Re: Validator Integration

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
validators ... and what else will we need? David Graham wrote: Actually, I think that's what I really wanted without knowing it :-). Struts already provides pluggable RequestProcessors for the ActionServlet, maybe it should allow pluggable Validators for ActionForms. This way, we don't

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib /htmlFormTag.java

2002-10-25 Thread David Graham
I'm following the html 4.01 spec stated here: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.3 It says it's case insensitive and the example further down the page uses the lower case form post. All other Struts generated attributes and elements are lower case so I changed this to match.

Re: Struts IRC Channel

2002-10-26 Thread David Graham
I for one, will not be answering questions on another forum. It's hard enough to keep up with the questions on this list :-). Also, I think it's a good that there be a central place to ask Struts questions. David From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL

Modules vs. Sub-Applications

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
Going back to the discussion on calling modules sub-applications, I think it was decided to call everything a module to eliminate confusion. The naming of Struts 1.1 classes and methods is not helping this situation. For example, we have an ApplicationConfig class and

Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
Would it make sense to keep the current names but deprecate and replace them in a future version (maybe 2.0)? David From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Modules vs.

Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:11:17 -0800 (PST) On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:24:36 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL

RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
You still haven't addressed why you want to do this. If html:form can't lookup the form bean because the action doesn't match an action mapping, then the other html form related tags are basically useless. You could just use straight html for this. David From: Taylor, Jason [EMAIL

RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
an opinion before I offer a patch. Any ideas? -JT -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag You still haven't addressed why you want to do

RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:29:11 -0800 Thanks for your comments-- I have some responses below. -Original Message- From: David Graham

Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications

2002-10-28 Thread David Graham
+1 on rename and deprecation. David From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:48:05 -0800 (PST) On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Rob

Re: Struts with style

2002-10-29 Thread David Graham
I think it's definitely an improvement but it opens up other issues. Personally, I don't like Arial and prefer Verdana because I think it's easier to read and looks more professional. Now, someone can come along and say, Hey, Verdana stinks!. I assume you did this by applying a simple

RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag

2002-10-29 Thread David Graham
' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:10:25 -0800 -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag

Re: Nice labels for inputs.

2002-10-29 Thread David Graham
Craig, We should consider adding an id attribute once Struts requires a jsp 1.2 container. I'm not sure if/when that will be but there seems to be lots of confusion on this. David From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts

Powered By Page

2002-10-30 Thread David Graham
I understand the criteria to be included on the powered by page to be that you either: 1. Put the powered by struts logo on a page or 2. include item 3 from the apache license on the page. Have I missed anything? How many pages do you have to put the logo on? Some of the sites listed need a

Re: Powered By Page

2002-10-30 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Powered By Page Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:21:16 -0500 Most were posted before the criteria came into effect. It would be good to clean house sometime, and then enforce the criteria proactively. -Ted. 10/30/2002 9:06:59 PM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Building Struts

2002-10-30 Thread David Graham
I'm starting to work on source patches so I'm setting up my build environment for testing purposes. I've found this exercise both mundane and time consuming. Would it be worthwhile to post a zipped up build environment with a build.properties that's ready to go? Getting all the appropriate

Re: Building Struts

2002-10-30 Thread David Graham
(PST) I wholeheatedly agree. Just had to redo my environment on a new machine. +1. -james --- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting to work on source patches so I'm setting up my build environment for testing purposes. I've found this exercise both mundane and time consuming

Re: Building Struts

2002-10-31 Thread David Graham
Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Building Struts Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:05:45 -0800 (PST) On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:32:31 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Building Struts

2002-10-31 Thread David Graham
That's exactly what I was thinking. Craig, you obviously know what you're doing and can build nightlies and get your build environment exactly how you want it. This idea wasn't really targeted towards those users. I just thought it would be helpful to have an environment ready to go for

Re: Struts taglib

2002-10-31 Thread David Graham
I agree with Craig. We shouldn't put any more effort into the taglibs than we need to. I am concerned about enhancing a few of the tags like errors and messages because they are struts specific and very useful. David From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers

RE: Attribute lowsrc of html:img is non-compliant?

2002-11-01 Thread David Graham
I didn't see it in the 3.2 spec either. We should deprecate this attribute, make its implementation do nothing, and remove it post 1.1. David From: Byrne, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename Application components to Module

2002-11-04 Thread David Graham
+1 on the ModuleConfig interface (Struts needs more of these). I'm not sure about StandardModuleConfigImpl though. Where will the user see this *Impl class if anywhere? If the user never has to write this then I suggest ModuleConfigImpl. If they have to write it somewhere then drop the Impl

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename Application components to Module

2002-11-04 Thread David Graham
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002-11-04 18:04:41 [Download message RAW] +1 on the ModuleConfig interface (Struts needs more of these). I'm not sure about StandardModuleConfigImpl though. Where will the user see this *Impl class if anywhere? If the user never has to write

ResourceBundle Use?

2002-11-05 Thread David Graham
Why doesn't Struts use the java's ResourceBundle class for dealing with localized messages? It seems that MessageResources is a combination of ResourceBundle and message formatting features, is that right? If we use ResourceBundle internally, it seems that we could save some code. For

Re: Action.java Globals.java questions.

2002-11-06 Thread David Graham
Don't add new constants to Action, only to Globals. I'm against making Action extend Globals because that's not what inheritance is for. Yes, it would be convenient but let's not go down that path. I'm confused about why the Action constants aren't deprecated, can someone explain? I thought

RE: [Vote] Modify classloading in RequestUtils

2002-11-07 Thread David Graham
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2? It's not like they have to pay to upgrade to 4.1.12. Maybe this isn't such a big deal. Dave From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Vote]

Re: javadoc Weird state of org/apache/struts/util/AppException.java

2002-11-08 Thread David Graham
Yes, I removed all the empty lines because it made the file very long. I'm not sure why it would show up as a single line though with ^M. That character normally shows up from windows systems right? I used Eclipse to make the changes and it shows up fine in my editor. I would love to see

Re: javadoc Weird state of org/apache/struts/util/AppException.java

2002-11-08 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: javadoc Weird state of org/apache/struts/util/AppException.java Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:41:37 -0500 David Graham wrote: Yes, I removed all the empty lines because it made the file very long. I'm not sure why it would show up as a single line though with ^M. That character

Sub Actions in an Action class

2002-11-08 Thread David Graham
This is a users list question, I'll forward it over there for you. David From: bachan s [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sub Actions in an Action class Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:19:25

RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
You could put the reset code in its own class and use composition to reuse that logic. Your subclasses of ActionForm and DynaActionForm could use your reset class in their reset() methods. David From: Jason Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
Interesting, but then you're creating a programming language in XML. I think this logic should be in code. David From: Karr, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Unclear semantics on form use

RE: RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
If the documentation is vague, you can create a patch and post it to bugzilla. I will apply any valid documentation patch ASAP. Thanks, David From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc;apache.org] Subject: RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards The missing link for a multi-page form is some way to tie which page got submitted to the set of properties that live on that page (and therefore need to be reset. As David Graham said: Interesting

Re: Changes for 2.0 (RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards)

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
!!) best, -b -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards Request scoped forms don't need to implement reset(). Ted has stated

RE: Changes for 2.0 (RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards)

2002-11-11 Thread David Graham
going on. If there's agreement, I'll submit patches. -b -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changes for 2.0 (RE: Unclear semantics on form use for wizards) http

Re: Replacing Action.* with Globals.*

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
at), but I can't see where changing internal code to use Global references over Action references would be a bad thing. David Graham wrote: Is it ok to replace the Action constant references with Globals constant references in the Struts code? I would hate to do this and have to back out the changes

RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals.*

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
: Replacing Action.* with Globals.* Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:49:49 -0800 -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Replacing Action.* with Globals.* I committed the updates

RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals.******** README *********

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
? Two strong oxen or 1024 chickens? - Seymour Cray (1925-1996), father of supercomputing -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals.* You are right

[VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
I've updated that html taglib tags to output xhtml when they are nested in a html:html xhtml=true tag. This was very simple to do and resulted in minor code changes. Users have suggested this approach: 1. Add Globals.XHTML_KEY which is a boolean request scoped attribute 2. html tags check

RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
, is preferable to choice 2 (runtime determination). -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] I've updated that html taglib tags to output xhtml when they are nested in a html:html xhtml=true tag. This was very simple to do and resulted in minor code changes

RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals.******** README *********

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals. README * +1 on separating formatting from code changes. In my defense, several of the files had import

RE: Replacing Action.* with Globals.******** README *********

2002-11-12 Thread David Graham
Mitchell Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist http://www.open-tools.org If you were plowing a field, which would you rather use? Two strong oxen or 1024 chickens? - Seymour Cray (1925-1996), father of supercomputing -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com

Re: OT - XFORMS Tag:

2002-11-13 Thread David Graham
This will probably be handled by JavaServer Faces. David From: V. Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT - XFORMS Tag: Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 07:58:55 -0500 One day form processing will be done like this: 1. XForms

Re: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-13 Thread David Graham
. -- Martin Cooper On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, David Graham wrote: I've updated that html taglib tags to output xhtml when they are nested in a html:html xhtml=true tag. This was very simple to do and resulted in minor code changes. Users have suggested this approach: 1. Add Globals.XHTML_KEY

RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-13 Thread David Graham
What if we did this: 1. Store a boolean in the request under Globals.XHTML_KEY 2. html:html xhtml=true would set the boolean to true 3. html:xhtml (new tag) would set the boolean to true 4. People could manually set the request attribute if they choose and realize potential problems. This

RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-13 Thread David Graham
Forgot this: 5. Tags nested in html:html xhtml=false will not be rendered in xhtml regardless of any other settings. Dave From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support Date

RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support

2002-11-13 Thread David Graham
with it. David From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [VOTE] How to implement XHMTL support Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:10:29 -0800 (PST) On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, David Graham wrote: What

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >