RE: [OT] RE: Struts Validator

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Galbreath
*ouch* that's harsh, man...really harsh. :-)~ -Original Message- From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:21 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.length() versus

Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Kyser
List Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.length() versus array.length mixup. That ought to quiet him down for a while... :) -jeff On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Micael wrote: I don't know about the rest of you, but I have found this approach

[OT] RE: Struts Validator

2003-08-14 Thread Micael
I don't know about the rest of you, but I have found this approach generally not to work. It especially does not work on an expert at it. LOL. I would use this on the quiet type, Steve. I think that with Mark you might find it not completely or utterly or wonderfully successful. But ,

Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Kyser
Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.length() versus array.length mixup. That ought to quiet him down for a while... :) -jeff On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Micael wrote: I don't know about the rest of you, but I have found this approach generally not to work. It especially

Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator

2003-08-14 Thread Micael
Yah, we have weapons. We are NOT forced to resort to the truth. LOL. At 06:21 PM 8/13/2003 -0500, Jeff Kyser wrote: Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.length() versus array.length mixup. That ought to quiet him down for a while... :) -jeff On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 05:55 PM,