I think UDDI and WSDL are just things on top of ejb's. They are for the
outside world to access business oriented services to other applications or
to people who want to access your apps with a different frontend.
If you have apps that access something via soap, where is the apps which
implements the soap interface at the inner side. ejb's serve this.
Dirk
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Simms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Thema: Re: STRUTS and EJB
Personally, I feel WSDL and UDDI complements EJB quite
well. You can't implement business logic in WSDL; WSDL
is just an interface definition using XML. EJB can't
interface to another which is not RMI-based; WSDL and
UDDI solves this problem.
--- Mark Simms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to beat a dead horse, but isn't the new SOAP and
> XML initiatives along
> with UDDI and WSDL specifications going to make EJBs
> look a bit less
> attractive for certain transactional applications ??
>
> BTW: that bye-bye struts article had little
> substance; it was an apparent
> attempt on the author's part to push his own MVC
> architecture. Also, anyone
> know why JavaReport allowed him to publish that
> trash ?
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
=?iso-8859-2?Q?$RFC822.eml?=
