On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:22:36PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> I was using HTTPClient, but I then switched to the com.mortbay.HTTP
> library (it comes with one of their products or something i believe).
> I forget why I did so, but I think it had something to do with
> limitations in dealing with filenam
I was using HTTPClient, but I then switched to the com.mortbay.HTTP
library (it comes with one of their products or something i believe).
I forget why I did so, but I think it had something to do with
limitations in dealing with filenames in HTTPClient. I advise you to
compare the two.
eric.
On
IL PROTECTED]
From: Maya Muchnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2
Hi,
Does anyone use HTTPClient? What do you think about it? I have got this link several
minutes ago.
As its document said, in HTTPClient you can set timeout for response, pipelining of
request. Source code is available. It includes the source code for parsing the
multiPartRequest.
HTTPClient can
4 matches
Mail list logo
