]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Session scope
I'm definitely considering running Struts with at
least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I
didn't even consider the effects of running
multiple
JVMs - never done it!
Currently
/COM+. Session related info
should be in the memory of app server. Session is
transient, not persistent.
Yong Chen
-Original Message-
From: Peter Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Session scope
I'm
I'm definitely considering running Struts with at
least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I
didn't even consider the effects of running multiple
JVMs - never done it!
Currently, my company has a big Oracle focus. There's
only one Oracle instance so they're using it to
maintain session
related info should be in the memory
of app server. Session is transient, not persistent.
Yong Chen
-Original Message-
From: Peter Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Session scope
I'm definitely considering
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Peter Smith wrote:
I'm definitely considering running Struts with at
least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I
didn't even consider the effects of running multiple
JVMs - never done it!
Currently, my company has a big Oracle focus. There's
only one Oracle
5 matches
Mail list logo