RE: FW: Session scope

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Smith
]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Session scope I'm definitely considering running Struts with at least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I didn't even consider the effects of running multiple JVMs - never done it! Currently

RE: FW: Session scope

2001-04-24 Thread Calvin Yu
/COM+. Session related info should be in the memory of app server. Session is transient, not persistent. Yong Chen -Original Message- From: Peter Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Session scope I'm

Re: FW: Session scope

2001-04-23 Thread Peter Smith
I'm definitely considering running Struts with at least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I didn't even consider the effects of running multiple JVMs - never done it! Currently, my company has a big Oracle focus. There's only one Oracle instance so they're using it to maintain session

RE: FW: Session scope

2001-04-23 Thread Chen, Yong
related info should be in the memory of app server. Session is transient, not persistent. Yong Chen -Original Message- From: Peter Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Session scope I'm definitely considering

Re: FW: Session scope

2001-04-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Peter Smith wrote: I'm definitely considering running Struts with at least 2 JVMs - one on each of 2 boxes. At first I didn't even consider the effects of running multiple JVMs - never done it! Currently, my company has a big Oracle focus. There's only one Oracle