Yes. In my application we are using this combination. It rocks!!
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Goedert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:27 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: struts + IBatis + EJB
Hello,
has anyone ever tryed (or did) put this 3
Ay quick newbie sample tutorial on iBATIS.
Truly, hearing for first time!
-Original Message-
From: Dalmia, Swati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:38 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: struts + IBatis + EJB
Yes. In my application we are using
Last year I was on a team that developed a complex ecommerce for T-Mobile
that used Struts 1.0.1 and EJB 1.1. We had the Action classes interfaced
with DAOs, which in turn went through a session façade (a single session
EJB) which in turn called some 40 different entity beans that, depending on
Buy the Oreilly book on Struts. There are some very good design principles
incorporated into this book using especially some of the J2EE design
patterns.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: yan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:49 AM
Subject: Struts
Martin Naskovski wrote:
Hello all. Is there an app that demonstrates the use of Struts EJB as a
persistence layer? I checked out Struts-Resume from Matt Raible, but it
uses Hibernate... Is there anything available w/EJB's? Thanks.
http://xpetstore.sf.net/
There are two implementations of
Maybe EJB should be used with JSF (and blue prints
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/index.html) instead of Struts.
Struts is more like this http://ibatis.com/jpetstore/jpetstore.html.
.V
Erik Price wrote:
Martin Naskovski wrote:
Hello all. Is there an app that demonstrates the use of
Download modelj from sourceforge and try it. Supply the path to your
j2ee.jar and build the sample app in 2 minutes. Modelj will create a
struts/ejb application for you from one single config file. Using JBoss,
all you have to do is setup a default data source and deploy your
sample.ear.
hi,
Struts doesnt enforce or set any rules or guidelines for using ejbs. With
in your action classes you should use Business Delegate to hide the client's
dependency on any persistance layer ejb or DAO.
Cheers
Ashwani Kalra
http://www.geocities.com/ashwani_kalra/
-Original Message-
try looking xpetstore.
xpetsotre.sourceforge.net.
see if it helps
Shashank
-Original Message-
From: Kalra, Ashwani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:24 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts w/EJB
hi,
Struts doesnt enforce or set any rules
http://xpestore.sourceforge.net
-Original Message-
From: Laurent MARQUEZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 July 2003 10:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: STRUTS with EJB
Hi,
I'm new in using of Struts.
I would like to integrate STRUTS with EJB.
I would like to have a complete example
Since you're attempting to access the EJB (actually the JNDI registry in
general) from OUTSIDE THE EJB CONTAINER (i.e. from Tomcat), you need to
specify a naming provider as a system property in the JAVA_ARGS of your
java command line. For example:
Not sure what the actual java command used
As for whether EJBs is going to be required in the near future for you
to get a job, who's to say?
Sadly, companies are very biased towards people who don't have specific
product experience in many cases. Don't take this the wrong way but EJB's
are not all that difficult. I have read a
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:18 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts vs EJB, thoughts?
As for whether EJBs is going to be required in the near
future for you
to get a job, who's to say?
Sadly, companies are very biased towards people who don't
have
Heck, we'd love it if our employer would buy an App Server but they won't
so we're using Struts
since it's free. But we've found out that it's very powerful and very
easy to work with.
Struts is cool, eh? If you want to use a free app server, check out
www.jboss.org
It's open-source, fast
Subject: RE: Struts vs EJB, thoughts?
Heck, we'd love it if our employer would buy an App Server but they won't
so we're using Struts
since it's free. But we've found out that it's very powerful and very
easy to work with.
Struts is cool, eh? If you want to use a free app server, check out
Subject: Re: Struts vs EJB, thoughts?
From: Vic Cekvenich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
EJBs, as I have said before sometimes have negative impact on design,
productivity and performance.
SHURTLEFF,ROBERT (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
Joseph,
Have you done any testing against HP Application Server
for the last 4 months and don't mind it. I see it as a poor
mans EJB.
Poor man's EJB ? :-)
No, EJB deals with very different problems.
Also, seems like Struts is more useful for smaller
companies and EJB is
more suitable for large corporations. Is this pretty much a valid
I dont think you can directly compare Struts to EJB since both solve
different problems.. but you can use EJB with Struts..
- Original Message -
From: Kousek, Theron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Struts
EJB and Struts are not the same thing. Struts is an open source
framework for building Web applications that integrates with standard
technologies like Java Servlets, JavaBeans, and JavaServer Pages (JSP).
Its goal is to do the mundane work of converting HTTP parameter
information into more
I prefer apples to oranges because they don't take their name from their
colour.
FYI, we use Struts with EJBs. EJBs are the M of MVC, Struts is the VC. There
is little to no overlap. If you don't need the container support provided
for EJBs (remote invocation, pooling, transactions, etc), then
-
To: +ACI-Struts Users Mailing List+ACI- +ADw-struts-user+AEA-jakarta.apache.org+AD4-
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Struts +ACY- EJB support
+AD4- When I did EJB's, my understanding was that Sun would recommend them for
+AD4- distributed application. Other's found them very slow
:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts +ACY- EJB support
+AD4- Am I not correct in suggesting that Action objects are essentially our
+AD4- opportunity to connect into an EJB model... Therefore struts' major
+AD4- focus is not on the Model side of things which is where EJB majors (esp. Entity
+AD4- Beans
: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
R. McClanahan
Sent: None
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: STRUTS and EJB
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Juha Paananen wrote:
I also agree on that stuff that has references to STRUTS should not be
transmitted to the EJB level. The problem
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/restricted/patterns/SessionFacade.ht
ml
EJB and Struts!
-Original Message-
From: craigmcc@localhost
[mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
R. McClanahan
Sent: None
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: STRUTS and EJB
On Thu, 23
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Juha Paananen wrote:
I also agree on that stuff that has references to STRUTS should not be
transmitted to the EJB level. The problem here is simply that I would
not want to make another, exactly similar (except extends ActionForm),
class for transporting the
Juha Paananen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to fill in a form JavaBean using a struts form, and after
validating it in my Action class, store it into the db using a session
EJB component. The proble here is that I have to extend ActionForm class
to make the bean work with Struts.
You can
I agree with Gregor. The ActionForm beans are best left as ActionForm
beans, and used only as an extension of the html:form tags. Once the
data is validated, it should be transferred to persistent stoarge, or to
another bean that is not bound to the HTTP layer (and could be re-used
in other
don't like the idea. My question is, is this inheritance of
ActionForm really necessary in Struts design?
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23. elokuuta 2001 20:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: STRUTS and EJB
I agree with Gregor
Title: RE: STRUTS and EJB
Why not make a Value object for passing the information around, and have the form hold an instance of the value object?
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Juha Paananen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: RE: STRUTS and EJB
If a
value object is used within the ActionForm for holding the form
data,
how
should the html elements be named so that the data elements in the value
object
is
automatically populated. Or should the data elements also reside in the
ActionForm as
separate fields
Yes, the inheritance is a necessary part of the Struts design.
I realize that it seems wasteful at first, but the ActionForm beans have
several special needs that may not apply to the other beans in your
application. An interface was tried in the earliest instances of the
framework, but
Title: RE: STRUTS and EJB
html:text property=valueObjectA.someNumber size=5 maxlength=5 /
Where the form has a Value object ValueObjectA, along with a public ValueObjectA getValueObjectA() method. The value object has a String someNumber in it, with a public String getSomeNumber() method
?
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Narayan, Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: STRUTS and EJB
If a value object is used within the ActionForm for holding the form
data,
how should the html elements
Thanks very much. This nested property thing seems like a nice solution
for the problem!
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24. elokuuta 2001 0:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: STRUTS and EJB
I just updated the Struts-Simple example
Title: RE: STRUTS and EJB
But
look at the mail send by Ted Husted asking not to use the Value Objects (
Business beans) inside the ActionForm bean
Here
it is -The other reason was that people tried to turn their business beans into ActionForm beans,
which is really not a good idea
implements the soap interface at the inner side. ejb's serve this.
Dirk
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Simms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Thema:Re: STRUTS and EJB
Personally, I feel WSDL and UDDI complements EJB quite
well. You can't implement business logic in WSDL
Not to beat a dead horse, but isn't the new SOAP and XML initiatives along
with UDDI and WSDL specifications going to make EJBs look a bit less
attractive for certain transactional applications ??
BTW: that bye-bye struts article had little substance; it was an apparent
attempt on the author's
Personally, I feel WSDL and UDDI complements EJB quite
well. You can't implement business logic in WSDL; WSDL
is just an interface definition using XML. EJB can't
interface to another which is not RMI-based; WSDL and
UDDI solves this problem.
--- Mark Simms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to beat
38 matches
Mail list logo
