Hi Ryan,
Most of the frameworks available are very similar to Struts. The only
difference is that they tie you into the specific app server in most cases.
Also as they are only used by a subset of developers that use the specific
app server their user base and hence experience base will be much
. For starters, Struts is vendor-neutral. What happens if you decide to
migrate an app developed with WebSphere's framework to JBoss?
. I am using Struts with Weblogic. I don't believe I'm in the vanguard with
this.
Cheers,
David Ventimiglia
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Norman
Hi Ryan,
Yes, there are other, propietary frameworks to be used, as well as rules
processing engines, in many of the commercial web servers.
So, why use Struts?
Some of these commercial web servers have very powerful features, but you
pay the price of tying oneself to the web server. Not just
Ryan,
1) There may be MVC frameworks available as value-adds to WebSphere,
WebLogic, etc. They may not port from one app server to another. Struts
should run in any JSP/Servlet spec-compliant web container. With proprietary
frameworks, you risk getting precisely what many hope to avoid by
Ryan,
Struts is app server neutral. I am currently working on a project
using struts and WebLogic. We have saved a tremendous amount of time by
implementing struts as our framework. You should not be looking at this
as struts and Tomcat versus Web Sphere and ? You should look at this as
5 matches
Mail list logo
