why dont the struts guys and the WW guys join up?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jasnowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:22 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: what the webwork guys say about struts
I thought the use
That would be like the Lutherans and the Episcopalians joining up.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:18 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: what the webwork guys say about struts
why dont
why dont the struts guys and the WW guys join up?
Competition is good. It drives all parties to
continously improve the product.
-TPP
-
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
snip src=wiki.opensymphony.com
WebWorks pros include being a smaller, simpler framework, not having to
build ActionForm beans, making it very simple to test your Actions, having
multiple well-supported view technologies, simpler views with less JSP tags
and a more powerful expression language,
--- Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip src=wiki.opensymphony.com
WebWorks pros include being a smaller, simpler framework, not having to
build ActionForm beans,
DynaActionForms anyone?
making it very simple to test your Actions,
having
multiple well-supported view technologies,
: RE: what the webwork guys say about struts
--- Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip src=wiki.opensymphony.com
WebWorks pros include being a smaller, simpler framework, not having to
build ActionForm beans,
DynaActionForms anyone?
making it very simple to test your Actions,
having
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:20 AM
Subject: RE: what the webwork guys say about struts
snip src=wiki.opensymphony.com
WebWork's pros include being a smaller, simpler framework
7 matches
Mail list logo
