move their beer on Friday ;->
-Original Message-
From: Gregory F. March [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justification Request)
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big
TED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justification Request)
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
How can I guarantee that there are
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Gregory F. March wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:02:47 -0400
> From: Gregory F. March <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: YASJR
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Gregory F. March wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:54:30 -0400
> From: Gregory F. March <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: YASJR
>
> Nope, WLS 6.1SP4. :-(
BEA uses Struts compatability as a selling point for WLS 8.1:
"Enterprise-class architecture - Implement standards-based applications
leveraging Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture and Struts framework"
http://kr.bea.com/products/workshop/features/features.shtml
E
On Sep 11, 2003, Shane Mingins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Have u seen http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/volunteers.html
Have now, thanks!
/greg
--
Gregory F. March-=-http://www.gfm.net:81/~march-=-AIM:GfmNet
---
--- "Gregory F. March" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2003, "Steve Raeburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> |If they're worried about rogue committers -- and I'd say we're
> probably all
> |rogues ;-) -- you can monitor the struts-dev list and be notified of
> every
> |single chang
Have u seen http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/volunteers.html
Cheers
Shane
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory F. March [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:03 p.m.
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justif
On Sep 10, 2003, "Gregory F. March" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|I am not aware of how the actual commits are done, but how does
|publicizing them on a development list stop anything? Someone still has
|to do the cvs command to commit the change and that is where the
|malicious person can in
September 10, 2003 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justification Request)
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, e
On Sep 10, 2003, "Steve Raeburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|If they're worried about rogue committers -- and I'd say we're probably all
|rogues ;-) -- you can monitor the struts-dev list and be notified of every
|single change to the codebase as it happens. I bet you can't get that level
|o
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Gregory F. March wrote:
> [snip]
> What other guarantees can I make to my management? What is the process
> the Struts team uses to control a rogue contributor?
The only potential "rogue contributor" that could possibly affect
things is someone who has commit access on the C
Congratulations and thanks for evangalising Struts to your organization.
> How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
> Struts code or any OS code for that matter?
The clue is in the title - OPEN source :-)
If open source has a weakness it certainly is not that anyon
Naveen
-Original Message-
From: cekvenich.vic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:45 PM
To: struts-user; cekvenich.vic
Subject: Re: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justification Request)
This is almost a Linux vs Windows: which is more secure/ the one that
has mil
Unless you get the Kool-aid from Jim Jones; in which case they would
associate the taste of Kool-aid with being dead. ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YASJR (Yet Another Struts Justification Request)
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
Struts c
This is almost a Linux vs Windows: which is more secure/ the one that
has millions of user eyes on the code!
In commercial code, a bomb is very easy and possible. In OS, unlikely.
I would also bet that given any industry (banks for ex), Struts is the
most popular in production use.
I know a few
> I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
> St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
>
> How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
> Struts code or any OS code for that matter?
>
> My immediate response was, how can
--- David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Gregory F. March" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
> > St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
> >
> > How can I guarantee that there are no hacks,
--- "Gregory F. March" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
> St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
>
> How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
> Struts code or any OS code for
I seem to have successfully pushed Struts in my company (a big Wall
St. bank). However, today, I was asked the following question:
How can I guarantee that there are no hacks, bombs, etc. in the
Struts code or any OS code for that matter?
My immediate response was, how can you guarantee
21 matches
Mail list logo
