I am starting a new app and trying to work out the best design approach.
At the moment I want to get the app up and running, and so I'm just
going to use tomcat and struts and achieve MVC by seperating out the
database access into factory classes.
At some point after I've got the project
I am starting a new app and trying to work out the best design approach. At
the moment I want to get the app up and running, and so I'm just going to
use tomcat and struts and achieve MVC by seperating out the database access
into factory classes.
At some point after I've got the project
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a project in the commons-sandbox called Mapper that may help you.
It allows you to plugin persistence layers without your app knowing or
changing (sort of like commons-logging).
Hello,
I can't find the Mapper project in the website, do you have an
OK, found !
It's in the cvs section of the site.
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: design issue MVC - forms, EJB, data marshalling
I am starting a new app and trying to work out the best
I can't find the Mapper project in the website, do you have an URL ?
It doesn't have a website yet because I just committed it recently but you
can get it out of cvs. I'm interested in any and all feedback.
David
Thanks,
--
Laurent
Adam Hardy wrote:
I am starting a new app and trying to work out the best design approach.
At the moment I want to get the app up and running, and so I'm just
going to use tomcat and struts and achieve MVC by seperating out the
database access into factory classes.
At some point after I've
I decided that I didn't have time to dive straight into EJB, although
I'm taking far more time than expected on the design. Hmph!
Thanks for the input. What though is POJO?
Erik Price wrote:
I think it would be better to employ the session facade pattern, perhaps
using a Session bean, for a
David Graham wrote:
There's a project in the commons-sandbox called Mapper that may help
you. It allows you to plugin persistence layers without your app
knowing or changing (sort of like commons-logging).
I'll check out Mapper. Thanks also for the link to the design patterns.
Adam
POJO = Plain Ole Java Object
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: design issue MVC - forms, EJB, data marshalling
I decided that I didn't have time to dive straight into EJB
Original Message -
From: Mike Jasnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POJO = Plain Ole Java Object
POJO = Plain Old Java Object
( nothing to do with Ole M$, just a typo )
--
Laurent
-
To
Actually I wasn't referring to OLE as in M$ speak, Ole is just a short
version of Old :)
-Original Message-
From: Laurent PETIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: design issue MVC - forms, EJB, data marshalling
-
From: Laurent PETIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: design issue MVC - forms, EJB, data marshalling
Original Message -
From: Mike Jasnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POJO = Plain Ole Java Object
David,
would you happen to have an example app or at least an action where you
have implemented the Mapper ?
Adam
David Graham wrote:
I can't find the Mapper project in the website, do you have an URL ?
It doesn't have a website yet because I just committed it recently but
you can get it out
-Original Message-
From: Laurent PETIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: design issue MVC - forms, EJB, data marshalling
Original Message -
From: Mike Jasnowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POJO = Plain Ole Java Object
Mike Jasnowski wrote:
Actually I wasn't referring to OLE as in M$ speak, Ole is just a short
version of Old :)
But not much shorter! ;)
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
David Graham wrote:
Actually I wasn't referring to OLE as in M$ speak, Ole is just a short
version of Old :)
By short, do you mean the same amount of characters ;-) ?
For some reason the POJO term really irritates me. I'm not sure why
we need a special nomenclature for Java objects.
NB,
David,
would you happen to have an example app or at least an action where you
have implemented the Mapper ?
Unfortunately, I just committed this and don't have example apps. The
javadoc is pretty good (I think) but there's not much else at this point.
Here's what you need to get started:
1.
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For some reason the POJO term really irritates me. I'm not sure why we
need a special nomenclature for Java objects.
Well, that said, why do you think guys the term POJO was invented for ?
I was told that it was invented because some people only swear by
Laurent PETIT wrote:
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For some reason the POJO term really irritates me. I'm not sure why we
need a special nomenclature for Java objects.
Well, that said, why do you think guys the term POJO was invented for ?
I was told that it was invented because some
19 matches
Mail list logo
