RE: html:form frustration

2002-09-20 Thread Jonathan Kovacs
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:46 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: html:form frustration Hi Jonathan, Sorry I jumped to conclusions :). I believe the action looker-upper ignores .do part in your action in the form tag but the correct syntax would

html:form frustration

2002-09-19 Thread Jonathan Kovacs
Hi All, I've been beating my head against this problem for a couple days now and frankly, I'm stumped... Using Struts 1.0.2, I'm attempting to display a select box which is filled with a list of options loaded into the session context. I've verified that the options are loaded (using an

Re: html:form frustration

2002-09-19 Thread Danny Mui
Looks like you're missing a form definition, lookup (the method causing the exception) is looking for the form bean when no name is specified in the field definition. action path=/load type=test.web.LoadAction -- name=editForm scope=request

RE: html:form frustration

2002-09-19 Thread Kevin A. Smith
Mailing List Subject: RE: html:form frustration Danny, Isn't that what this section of my struts_config.xml is for? form-beans form-bean name=editForm type=test.web.editForm / /form-beans Jonathan -Original Message- From: Danny Mui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: html:form frustration

2002-09-19 Thread Jonathan Kovacs
]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:37 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: html:form frustration That just associates a logical form name with the underlying Java implementation. You still need to tell Struts which form bean the action uses. --Kevin -Original Message- From

Re: html:form frustration

2002-09-19 Thread Danny Mui
Hi Jonathan, Sorry I jumped to conclusions :). I believe the action looker-upper ignores .do part in your action in the form tag but the correct syntax would be : html:form action=/edit /html:form Since your action config specifies /edit your form tag should also specify /edit. I think