Hi all,
I was using Log4J with struts1.0 with no problem. When I updated to
struts1.1b3, messages from Struts like RequestProcessor Processing a POST
request for path url are logged using my webapp log4j configuration file.
The problem is I don't want struts to log these messages but it keeps
You may want to increase your default console setting from DEBUG to WARN.
That would eliminate a lot of log messages.
-Original Message-
From: De Cesco, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:09 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: log4j problem
Hi all,
I
]]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 janvier 2003 14:10
À : 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: log4j problem
You may want to increase your default console setting from DEBUG to WARN.
That would eliminate a lot of log messages.
-Original Message-
From: De Cesco, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Subject: RE: log4j problem
ok but the real problem is that struts logs an INFO each time a request is
processed. My webapp should handle hundreds of simultaneous clients
therefore my personal webapps logs are not visible enough. But thanks
anyway.
-Message d'origine-
De : Pani, Gourav
]]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 janvier 2003 14:18
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: log4j problem
Can you see the originating class for all those struts loggings messages in
the
logged messages?
I mean in log4j ,u can disable the logging per class or package level..And
if
struts is using log4j, then it must
Mailing List'
Subject: RE: log4j problem
Yes I know the originating class that produces logs, it's RequestProcessor.
But I didn't know that log4j could exclude class from the logs. Is it
configurable in the log4j conf file ?
I will look into it, thanks.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL
hirarchies, it will still not change
-Original Message-
From: gourav.pani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:24 PM
To: struts-user
Subject: RE: log4j problem
i was under the impression that you do exclusion by inclusion. in other
words, if you specify
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 janvier 2003 14:31
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: log4j problem
.U can specify log level per logger as well.SO if u want to exclude logging
for
some packages,U specify a higher log level
It worked, thank you, my understanding of Log4J was rather limited!!
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 janvier 2003 14:31
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: log4j problem
.U can specify log level per logger as well.SO if u want
I am having a simmilar problem. I'm useing Struts 1.1b2
within WTE 3.5. The digester and requestProcessor refuse
to quit logging not matter what I set the log levels at.
I'm guessing I'm just not finding the correct
configuration file, but it's really getting annoying.
Matt,
On Thu, 30 Jan
Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 janvier 2003 14:45
À : Struts Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: log4j problem
I am having a simmilar problem. I'm useing Struts 1.1b2
within WTE 3.5. The digester and requestProcessor refuse
to quit logging not matter what I set the log levels at.
I'm
Did something change between 1.1b1 and 1.1b2 regarding log4j behavior in
struts? It's a long shot, but it's worth asking. Our log4j debug statements
are disappearing now and the only relevant change we made was to upgrade
from 1.1b1 to 1.1b2. I grepped through the struts source and wasn't able to
On 8/27/2002 at 3:16 PM Donald Ball wrote:
Did something change between 1.1b1 and 1.1b2 regarding log4j behavior in
struts? It's a long shot, but it's worth asking. Our log4j debug
statements
are disappearing now and the only relevant change we made was to upgrade
from 1.1b1 to 1.1b2. I grepped
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Donald Ball wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:16:15 -0400
From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mysterious log4j problem
Did something change between 1.1b1
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Donald Ball wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:54:13 -0400
From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysterious log4j problem
On 8/27/2002 at 12:48 PM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Have you heeded the comment at the bottom
On 8/27/2002 at 12:48 PM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Have you heeded the comment at the bottom of the 1.1-b2 download page
about picking up the latest commons-logging.jar? It's in the paragraph
that starts with bold text Log4J Users Please Note :-).
Nope, i was needlessly heedless. :) Thanks
16 matches
Mail list logo
