On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:32:01PM -0700, David Graham wrote:
} --- Paananen, Tero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
} +1 on the new option but I think the allowed characters should be
}
} a-zA-Z0-9_.-
}
} -999
}
} That's missing several perfectly valid
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses? The reason I ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's accepting as valid e-mail
addresses such as 'u-+-+%^_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I didn't think Validator
would accept these, but apparently is it. If there's not an
--- Jerry Jalenak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses?
I believe it's RFC 822.
The reason I
ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's accepting as valid
e-mail
addresses such as 'u-+-+%^_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I didn't think
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses? The
reason I ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's accepting
as valid e-mail
addresses such as 'u-+-+%^_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I didn't
think Validator
would accept these, but apparently is it. If there's not an
: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:34 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Validator] E-Mail Verification
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses? The
reason I ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's accepting
as valid e-mail
addresses
David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jerry Jalenak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses?
I believe it's RFC 822.
Unfortunately, I think that's a valid email address as defined in the RFC.
You're better off writing your own. RFC 822 is very
David Graham wrote:
--- Jerry Jalenak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses?
I believe it's RFC 822.
The reason I
ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's accepting as valid
e-mail
addresses such as 'u-+-+%^_/[EMAIL
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Jerry Jalenak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a published specification on e-mail addresses?
I believe it's RFC 822.
The reason I
ask is
that we are using the 'email' validator, and it's
+1 on the new option but I think the allowed characters should be
a-zA-Z0-9_.-
-999
That's missing several perfectly valid characters
in Email addresses, like a space, +, single quote,
etc.
The RFC defines the valid characters for a reason.
Lead, Web Publishing
LabOne, Inc.
10101 Renner Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
(913) 577-1496
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Validator] E-Mail Verification
--- Paananen, Tero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on the new option but I think the allowed characters should be
a-zA-Z0-9_.-
-999
That's missing several perfectly valid characters
in Email addresses, like a space, +, single quote,
etc.
The RFC
11 matches
Mail list logo