On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Robert Leland wrote:
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:10:54 -0500
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Graph of Struts Growth.l
Back in Feburary of 2001 when I
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:18:18 -0800 (PST)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
Very interesting!
I would
Back in Feburary of 2001 when I proposed to my new
employer that we use struts, one of the items I looked at was
mailing list traffic, between it and other open source projects.
I have been keeping that chart up to date and thought people here
might find it interesting. This is a simplified chart
Very interesting!
I would tend to agree with these numbers as the Struts
Console download rate has significantly increased over
time. I get over a hundred downloads a day now versus
under 50 several months ago.
I wonder if there are any numbers for how many Struts
downloads there are? 1.0 vs
stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:jholmes612;yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
Very interesting!
I would
That chart makes me feel like there should be some sort of
accompanyment. You know - a sound-track! The numbers look a bit high
though. Are you doing some multiplication in there? ... a factor of
say 2-5?
Very interesting guys.
James Mitchell wrote:
That's really cool.
I have a chart of
about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush;swbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
That chart makes me feel like there should be some sort
I just can't imagine there being so danged many emails - and such a
large percentage of them [OT].
... do we blabber senslessly that much?
I actually went back and examined Rob's again after I clicked send. His
corroborates yours pretty much. I just can't believe there's that much
traffic!
about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush;swbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
I just can't imagine there being so danged many emails
LMAO - you were serious?! I thought you were cracking a joke about my
comments!
emote:walkingAway
emote:addEffect name=shake-head/
... shoulda known better ... :-)
/emote:walkingAway
James Mitchell wrote:
LOLno...the Rand() is Randomize. (Completely Useless Data)
Sorry, just thought
Need to loosen that tie just a bit Eddie. ;)
- Original Message -
From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
LMAO - you were serious?! I thought you were cracking
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush;swbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Graph of Struts Growth.l
I just can't imagine there being so danged many emails - and such a
large percentage of them [OT
, Chris P [PCS] [mailto:cbartl03;sprintspectrum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:42 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Graph of Struts Growth.l
Importance: Low
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush;swbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002
13 matches
Mail list logo
