Re: j_security_check

2003-03-31 Thread ronanoc
allow such login requests. http://securityfilter.sourceforge.net/ -Max - Original Message - From: Scott Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:12 PM Subject: Re: j_security_check Hi Ronan You'll get this when you go directly

Re: j_security_check

2003-03-31 Thread Max Cooper
have changed when setting it up for your app might get you to a solution the fastest. -Max - Original Message - From: ronanoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:38 AM Subject: Re: j_security_check So I have got the demo

Re: j_security_check

2003-03-19 Thread Scott Barr
Hi Ronan You'll get this when you go directly to the page for the user to login. Instead, setup a resource that is protected by Container Managed Security eg. /userHome.do, which will then take you to your login page. Once login is successful, you will be fowarded on to /userHome.do Once you've

Re: j_security_check

2003-03-19 Thread Max Cooper
Message - From: Scott Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 4:12 PM Subject: Re: j_security_check Hi Ronan You'll get this when you go directly to the page for the user to login. Instead, setup a resource that is protected

Re: j_security_check

2003-03-19 Thread Scott Barr
, 2003 4:12 PM Subject: Re: j_security_check Hi Ronan You'll get this when you go directly to the page for the user to login. Instead, setup a resource that is protected by Container Managed Security eg. /userHome.do, which will then take you to your login page. Once login

Re: j_security_check with LogonAction

2003-01-31 Thread Gemes Tibor
2003. január 31. 01:06 dátummal MarwanSalam ezt írtad: Hi, I am trying to use j_security_check Servlet to authenticate users from a login.jsp. However, if I do this, I will not be able to take advantage of LogonAction class where I need to set certain session and request attributes. If I

Re: j_security_check with LogonAction

2003-01-31 Thread Alok Garg
Hello, What I have done is like: 1) I forward the user to ActionClass after the LoginPage (not the default one but to the coustom one). 2) In this action class I set all the parameters that I require. 3) After this I forward the user to the j_security_check part. - Original Message - From:

RE: j_security_check with LogonAction

2003-01-31 Thread David Bolsover
Hi I think the solution to this is to make LoginAction.do a protected resource. Any attempt to access LoginAction.do will cause your login page to be displayed and following sucessful authentication, you can complete the action in LoginAction.do - including forwards to your chosen page. db

RE: j_security_check with LogonAction

2003-01-31 Thread Raible, Matt
I usually create an ActionFilter that maps to the same url-pattern as my Action class. You can then set a userForm or token in the session if it's null, and that way you'll know if they just logged in or not. Seems to work pretty well for me. Here's an example: http://tinyurl.com/55an HTH,

Re: j_security_check

2002-11-18 Thread Michael Lee
Dont use struts html:something tags inside your form. bean:message and such are ok. Otherwise, it thinks you want to use an ActionForm. Mike - Original Message - From: Darren Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:21 PM

RE: j_security_check

2002-11-18 Thread Paananen, Tero
Wow. I had this working awesome ... now I get a HTTP ERROR: 404 Not Found RequestURI=/CMWeb/WEB-INF/pages/j_security_check This doesn't look right. Couple of possibilities I can think of. 1. Doublecheck that you have form based authentication enabled in your web.xml 2. Try changing

Re: j_security_check

2002-11-18 Thread Gemes Tibor
2002-11-18, h keltezssel Darren Hill ezt rta: Wow. I had this working awesome ... now I get a I never had this phenomenon before however I use extension mapping so j_security_check never matches *.do. Tib -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

RE: j_security_check

2002-11-18 Thread Brian Topping
Darren, Try completely cleaning your login form of Struts tags. When you get that to work, add them back slowly to see which ones are giving the problem. I've found that I can put a login form using j_security_check inside a Struts tile, but using Struts tags caused problems for me of the sort

RE: j_security_check

2002-11-18 Thread Darren Hill
:48 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: j_security_check Darren, Try completely cleaning your login form of Struts tags. When you get that to work, add them back slowly to see which ones are giving the problem. I've found that I can put a login form using j_security_check inside

Re: j_security_check, jaas and weblogic 6.1

2002-08-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
JAAS is not relevant if you're using container-managed security. You'll need to set up users in whatever user database your container (WebLogic in your case) provides. Struts also has nothing to do with this -- although you can use role information with tags like logic:present or the roles

Re: j_security_check, jaas and weblogic 6.1

2002-08-26 Thread Michael Lee
are now going full steam ahead with struts! thanks, Mike Lee - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:52 PM Subject: Re: j_security_check, jaas and weblogic 6.1 JAAS is not relevant

Re: j_security_check, jaas and weblogic 6.1

2002-08-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Michael Lee wrote: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:29:44 -0400 From: Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: j_security_check, jaas and weblogic 6.1 Thank you! You

RE: 'j_security_check' and unsecured resource access

2002-05-06 Thread Tero P Paananen
1. login successfully using 'j_security_check'; 2. the next request happens to be to an unsecured url (e.g. /do/frontpage (with no restrictions in web.xml) -- DispatchServlet -- user.frontpage (tiles)) ; 3. the request methods 'getUserPrincipal()', 'isUserInRole()' and 'getRemoteUser()'

RE: j_security_check

2002-03-19 Thread ltorrence
I'm on the phone with IBM at this moment. The scoop I got from searching the WEbsphere newsgroup was that 4.02 broke the forwarding for form-based security. That's what I was experiencing, and the message said that the fix was only available by calling IBM support. Supposedly efix PQ56667 fixes

Re: j_security_check form authentication controlled in WAR context?

2001-03-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Richard Yumul wrote: Is there a way to define the authenticating class within the WAR context? I like the way SimpleRealm JDBCRealm work, automatically protecting every resource matching a regex. However if I need a custom realm, I'd really prefer to have it be