[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2022-04-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771740 Title: Expose link offload options Status in netplan: Fix Released

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2022-03-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
This bug was mostly about exposing the offload options in general. But indeed the tristate should be handled properly. Let's continue that discussion in LP: #1956264 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-11-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
I've tested netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.3 from focal-proposed. The netplan generator command was run successfully, producing correct *Offload=1 settings for networkd. root@sru-ff:~# dpkg -l | grep netplan ii libnetplan0:amd64 0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.3 amd64 YAML network configuration

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-11-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
I've tested netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.3 from hirsute-proposed. The netplan generator command was run successfully, producing correct *Offload=1 settings for networkd. root@sru-hh:~# dpkg -l | grep netplan ii libnetplan0:amd64 0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.3 amd64 YAML network configuration

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-11-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
I've tested netplan.io 0.103-0ubuntu7.1 from impish-proposed and attached the autopkgtest logs to the bug description, according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetplanUpdates. The netplan generator command was run successfully, producing correct *Offload=1 settings for networkd. root@sru-ii:~# dpkg

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-11-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: [Impact] - * On virtualization hosts disable GRO and LRO, otherwise, with -receive offload on, the guests will receive packets that are -larger than the MTU. This can cause issues in certain scenarios, -e.g. when the guest is a VPN server that needs to

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-11-05 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: [Impact] -  * On virtualization hosts disable GRO and LRO, otherwise, with -    receive offload on, the guests will receive packets that are -    larger than the MTU. This can cause issues in certain scenarios, -    e.g. when the guest is a VPN server that needs to

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-28 Thread Lukas Märdian
Some more smaller remarks: * We can drop the bundled "Implement-YAML-state-tracking-and-use-it-in-the-DBus.patch" from the Hirsute and Focal debdiffs (it has already been SRUed in the meantime). * We need to fix the version strings

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-28 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771740 Title: Expose link offload options Status in netplan:

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you Nicolas, I cleaned up some fuzz and whitespace around the "activation_mode" field in src/parse.h but other than that the patch looks like I wanted it to be (wrt. ABI compatibility). I've uploaded it to Jammy. Let's see how that works out wrt. autopkgtests. If everything is good and

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Wishlist Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771740 Title: Expose link offload options Status in

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-14 Thread Lukas Märdian
Hi Nicolas, yes I meant to simply add it to the struct at the correct (upstream) location, so that the data structure won't change (only append new fields) when we release the next upstream version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-10-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
I am generally +1 with SRUing this, BUT this is a special in a few ways: 1/ In order to land this in Focal, we first need to apply it to Impish and Hirsute (according to SRU process), as ddstreet mentioned. 2/ We are already post Feature Freeze for Impish and this is adding new functionality IMO

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1771740] Re: Expose link offload options

2021-09-30 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu

[Sts-sponsors] [Bug 1817651] Re: Primary slave on the bond not getting set.

2021-01-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you Seyeong for preparing the debdiff for Bionic. It is malformatted at line 36, but I fixed that. The patch was taken from upstream and LGTM, it passed all build tests (incl. the new one from the patch)! For SRU verification, please also attach the Bionic test logs of our integration