Re: [STUMP] Refactoring StumpWM's useful bits

2014-12-10 Thread Chris Dunder
Very well put, Joram. On Dec 9, 2014 11:48 AM, "Joram Schrijver" wrote: > Hi, > > As I see it, there are two things involved here: > > 1. Moving some of the elsewhere useful functionality into libraries > 2. Refactoring internals to improve decoupling of mostly-unrelated >functionality. > > I

Re: [STUMP] Refactoring StumpWM's useful bits

2014-12-09 Thread Joram Schrijver
Hi, As I see it, there are two things involved here: 1. Moving some of the elsewhere useful functionality into libraries 2. Refactoring internals to improve decoupling of mostly-unrelated functionality. I'll first address the second point, since I see it as somewhat of a prerequisite for the