Re: [STUMP] [stumpwm-contrib]
Hi David, Thanks for clearing this up even further! By the way, is there any single source of truth for for all those changes vectors you described? Maybe some kind of TODO list was established somewhere? I've migrated to stumpwm about more than 3 years at this time and very much like both the idea and all the hard work doen form the start including yours. So now Stumpwm is large part of my workflow and I want it to evolve ant thrive even further. I talk about all this because despite having not too much time to hack on stumpwm I definitely want to help making it better. For example, I keep in mind our talk some time ago (on Github) about improving stumpwm-contrib extensions documentation. I think it could be good staring point (though not much of writing code). Moreover, I have some thoughts about improving stumpwm itself - at least what I've found cumbersome or in some other way distracting. These thoughts may be wrong in any way due to possible disalignment with current stumpwm development (new ideas introduced/implemented, etc.), that's why I'm asking :) regards, Alex David Bjergaard writes: > Hi Alex, > > I am accepting PRs for both stumpwm and contrib. The bar for entry into > stumpwm > contrib is very low, but sometimes it takes me a few days to just hit the > merge > button. > > For stumpwm I don't usually merge without reviewing the code and making sure > that it doesn't break the build. > > My reference to putting stumpwm in maintenance mode, was from my perspective > as > maintainer. There's a lot of the underlying structure of stumpwm that is > showing its age. While the codebase is mature and mostly bug-free (if not > quirky), it probably won't make it another decade. I would rather focus my > major development efforts on restructuring stumpwm as a "stumpwm 2.0 codenamed > paulownia." > > Anyway, PRs are very welcome! > > Best, > > David > > > aaermo...@gmail.com writes: > >> Hi, Joram >> >> Thanks for clearing this up. >> >> I've just came over the email from David saying about maintainance mode, >> about a year ago, and just went curious if it affects merging new code >> in any way because my last contribution were merged much earlier than >> mentioned email was sent. >> >> regards, >> Alex >> >> Joram Schrijver writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> PRs are definitely still being merged into both stumpwm and >>> stumpwm-contrib. In fact, PRs for both have been merged a few hours ago. >>> >>> It sometimes takes a few days for changes to be reviewed and accepted, >>> but they are very welcome. >>> >>> -- >>> Joram >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 07:58 PM, aaermo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Since StumpWM gone in maintainance mode more than a year ago, I may have been overlooked possible respective status change of stumpwm-contrib project. So, is there a chance for PRs to land in stumpwm-contrib, and if not, could this status be changed in some foreseeble future? regards, Alex ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel >>> >>> ___ >>> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >>> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel >> >> ___ >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Re: [STUMP] [stumpwm-contrib]
Hi Alex, I am accepting PRs for both stumpwm and contrib. The bar for entry into stumpwm contrib is very low, but sometimes it takes me a few days to just hit the merge button. For stumpwm I don't usually merge without reviewing the code and making sure that it doesn't break the build. My reference to putting stumpwm in maintenance mode, was from my perspective as maintainer. There's a lot of the underlying structure of stumpwm that is showing its age. While the codebase is mature and mostly bug-free (if not quirky), it probably won't make it another decade. I would rather focus my major development efforts on restructuring stumpwm as a "stumpwm 2.0 codenamed paulownia." Anyway, PRs are very welcome! Best, David aaermo...@gmail.com writes: > Hi, Joram > > Thanks for clearing this up. > > I've just came over the email from David saying about maintainance mode, > about a year ago, and just went curious if it affects merging new code > in any way because my last contribution were merged much earlier than > mentioned email was sent. > > regards, > Alex > > Joram Schrijver writes: > >> Hi, >> >> PRs are definitely still being merged into both stumpwm and >> stumpwm-contrib. In fact, PRs for both have been merged a few hours ago. >> >> It sometimes takes a few days for changes to be reviewed and accepted, >> but they are very welcome. >> >> -- >> Joram >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 07:58 PM, aaermo...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since StumpWM gone in maintainance mode more than a year ago, I may have >>> been overlooked possible respective status change of stumpwm-contrib >>> project. >>> >>> So, is there a chance for PRs to land in stumpwm-contrib, and if not, >>> could this status be changed in some foreseeble future? >>> >>> regards, >>> Alex >>> >>> ___ >>> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >>> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel >> >> ___ >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > ___ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Re: [STUMP] [stumpwm-contrib]
Hi, Joram Thanks for clearing this up. I've just came over the email from David saying about maintainance mode, about a year ago, and just went curious if it affects merging new code in any way because my last contribution were merged much earlier than mentioned email was sent. regards, Alex Joram Schrijver writes: > Hi, > > PRs are definitely still being merged into both stumpwm and > stumpwm-contrib. In fact, PRs for both have been merged a few hours ago. > > It sometimes takes a few days for changes to be reviewed and accepted, > but they are very welcome. > > -- > Joram > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 07:58 PM, aaermo...@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since StumpWM gone in maintainance mode more than a year ago, I may have >> been overlooked possible respective status change of stumpwm-contrib >> project. >> >> So, is there a chance for PRs to land in stumpwm-contrib, and if not, >> could this status be changed in some foreseeble future? >> >> regards, >> Alex >> >> ___ >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel > > ___ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Re: [STUMP] [stumpwm-contrib]
Hi, PRs are definitely still being merged into both stumpwm and stumpwm-contrib. In fact, PRs for both have been merged a few hours ago. It sometimes takes a few days for changes to be reviewed and accepted, but they are very welcome. -- Joram On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 07:58 PM, aaermo...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Since StumpWM gone in maintainance mode more than a year ago, I may have > been overlooked possible respective status change of stumpwm-contrib > project. > > So, is there a chance for PRs to land in stumpwm-contrib, and if not, > could this status be changed in some foreseeble future? > > regards, > Alex > > ___ > Stumpwm-devel mailing list > Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
[STUMP] [stumpwm-contrib]
Hi, Since StumpWM gone in maintainance mode more than a year ago, I may have been overlooked possible respective status change of stumpwm-contrib project. So, is there a chance for PRs to land in stumpwm-contrib, and if not, could this status be changed in some foreseeble future? regards, Alex ___ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel