Dan, use Wireshark, capture traffic using Stunnel, set a filter based
on the destination IP (i.e., "ip.addr == 10.5.2.0/24" if class C
network), look for traffic with the host, and look for "Protocol"
column. For my captures, it shows "TLSv1.2" and for "Secure Sockets
Layer" it shows the
I don't run Solaris, so I can only assume you have a stunnel.conf file in
/etc/stunnel or in /etc location. Edit that location and change:
sslVersion = TLSv1
options = NO_SSLv2
options = NO_SSLv3
to:
sslVersion = TLSv1.2
options = NO_SSLv2
options = NO_SSLv3
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:08
.
Good luck!
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Kenway Ng <kenwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rob. Appreciate the information.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, 4:28 PM Rob Lockhart <rlock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to this:
>> https://access.redhat.com/suppo
.8. Is
> that right ? Is it possible to find a version that was already compiled
> with a higher version of openssl ?
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Rob Lockhart <rlock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Kenway Ng <k
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Kenway Ng wrote:
>
> I am trying to upgrade our version of stunnel. Our SME left and now I am
> trying to upgrade stunnel to fix a vulnerability . I am being told to use
> TLS1.1 or higher
>
> $ ./stunnel -version
>
> stunnel 4.15 on
Mike,
I tried with IBM's XLC 13.1.2 and these options were ignored:
-Wall -Wpedantic -Wformat=2 -Wconversion -Wno-long-long
-Wno-depreciated-declarations
I compiled it as follows:
cd ~/SRC; rm -rf stunnel-5.27; gzip -dc stunnel-5.27b3.tar.gz | tar xvf -;
cd stunnel-5.27
export
On AIX 6.1 using IBM's XLC compiler, I do "configure" and that successfully
completes. However, when I "make", it fails due to the parameters
"-fstack-protector" and "-fPIE"... apparently it couldn't find the files
"stack-protector" and "PIE" as "-f" specifies a file. However, gcc and
perhaps many
According to your log files, something else is already listening on port 25.
from stunnel.conf:
; GMail ssmtp settings
[ssmtp]
accept = 25
connect = smtp.gmail.com:465
and from error log:
[!] Error binding service [ssmtp] to 0.0.0.0:25
[!] bind: No error (0)
That means if you're running
Michal,
I was able to build Stunnel 5.17 on AIX 6.1 using the build command,
after completely removing the entire section for -fstack-protector in
configure (my stunnel-5.17.patch file below). I used the following
commands:
mkdir $HOME/stunnel-bin-5.17
gzip -dc stunnel-5.17.tar.gz | tar xvf -
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Coviello, Paul pcovie...@ccsusa.com
wrote:
Perfect!
Thank you very much!
That's the part I was missing the most... I kept trying to telnet to the
server...
Now to figure out how to keep it running on VMS
BTW: Rob gmail is blocked for me that's
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Coviello, Paul pcovie...@ccsusa.com
wrote:
Hi,
Well I got it started on VMS and wanted to put it in debug mode, so I shut
it down made my changes to the conf file and now well I can't start it with
the command procedure.
I even tried the old conf and
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Coviello, Paul pcovie...@ccsusa.com wrote:
here is the hp webpage...
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/opensource/opensource.html#stunnel
Ok so it appears the HP webpage shows a different version of stunnel than
the page you linked before
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Coviello, Paul pcovie...@ccsusa.com wrote:
Ok thanks here is the 1st version of the file...
All I want to do is create a telnet session from a windows terminal
emulator to my VMS server.
also someone thinks that this version may not play well with SSL 1.4
*From:* stunnel-users [mailto:stunnel-users-boun...@stunnel.org
stunnel-users-boun...@stunnel.org] *On Behalf Of *Rob Lockhart
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:28 PM
*To:* stunnel-users@stunnel.org
*Subject:* Re: [stunnel-users] openvms and stunnel
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM
Hello, I just noticed a urgency discrepancy for Stunnel 5.12 on the
website (both of these links are under the Downloads section):
https://www.stunnel.org/versions.html - shows 5.12 urgency as HIGH
https://www.stunnel.org/sdf_ChangeLog.html - shows 5.12 urgency as LOW
I don't know if it makes a
Unless I'm mistaken, stunnel version 5 currently supports the options
shown below for sslVersion:
all = TLS v1.0, TLS v1.1, TLS v1.2, SSLv2, SSLv3
TLSv1 = TLS v1.0 only (not TLS v1.1, TLSv1.2, SSLv2 or SSLv3)
TLSv1.1 = TLS v1.1 only
TLSv1.2 = TLS v1.2 only
In order to support TLS v1.0, TLS v1.1
16 matches
Mail list logo