There might be a throughput degradation in the more recent versions of
stunnel. I have recently been testing the 5.32 version of stunnel and
have noticed that the tps drop quite significantly when moving from
5.06 to 5.32. Im willing to admit it could be something to do with my
config or testing.
The first time is fine, the second, crashes stunnel. Not happening
>>>> with 5.44.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't seen any change to SNI in manual so... :-?
>>>>
>>>> These are the configs for the used virtual servers. Nothing has been
>>>&g
2018.04.03 11:11:08 LOG7[main]: Signal pipe is empty
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
--
Mark Brookes
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
+44 (0)330 380 1064
m...@loadbalancer.org
___
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@stunnel.org
https
>> client = no
>> sni = SSL:xxx
>>
>> connect = y.y.y.2:443
>>
>> cert = pem
>> key = pem
>>
>>
>> Don't mind the port numbers. They aren't in conflict.
>>
>>
>> Running on Windows 2000.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
]
This is all the information we have at the moment.
--
Mark Brookes
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
+44 (0)330 380 1064
m...@loadbalancer.org
___
stunnel-users mailing list
stunnel-users@stunnel.org
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
1d ?
>
> Thanks again!
> ________
> From: Mark Brookes
> Sent: November 8, 2019 3:47 AM
> To: Francois Robinette
> Cc: stunnel-users@stunnel.org
> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] segfault with v5.55
>
> The stunnel guys have worked tirelessly to
7797978 error 6
> in libpthread-2.12.so[7f70aa1e5000+17000]
>
>
>
> ___
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users@stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
--
Mark Brookes
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.l
Did updating to the newer openssl resolve your issue?
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 11:20, Mark Brookes wrote:
>
> > Do you think I should also compile it with the latest OpenSSL 1.1.1d ?
> Yes, you can do that.
>
> Our issue specifically related to 1.1.0k Its interesting you hav
