On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 14:41 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> + const char hostname[64];
Ugh, yes, that "const" is bogus. It was "const char *" with a helper
function in an earlier incantation, and then I made it a direct array
and
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 14:41 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> diff --git a/linux.c b/linux.c
> index ea0170dc89f8..03d0bfbf9670 100644
> --- a/linux.c
> +++ b/linux.c
> + if (username && *username) {
> + const char hostname[64];
> + struct membuffer mb = { 0 };
> +
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:33:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] git-save: improve commit authorship data
We used to always just commit as "subsurface@hohndel.org" because
libgit-19 doesn't have the interfaces to do user name lookup. This does
better if you have libgit-20, using "git_
two patches that goes on top of the last three ones:
1 - list of files insteaf of grepping to *.c
2 - specify the libdcdevel path
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> Second try, with dirk's input on IRC.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
>>
>
Second try, with dirk's input on IRC.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
> So -
> CMake has a testing framework called CTest that can generate html reports
> and it's easy to integrate a new test on it. I created this in cmake *only*
> because it was what I had used befor
So -
CMake has a testing framework called CTest that can generate html reports
and it's easy to integrate a new test on it. I created this in cmake *only*
because it was what I had used before, tried to learn the docs for qmake +
tests and it was a bit frustrating / hard to do.
what this does rig
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 14:02 +0200, Gehad wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 04:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > I think I had something slightly different in mind:
> >
> > The prefs variable should contain a member for each setting. And we need
That was too simplistic :-)
> > to redo those members so they
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:23 -0500, Lakshman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > This works well - but when playing with it I noticed that currently
> > edits are broken - they don't modify the data in the dive.
> >
> > This is not something that your patch broke,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> This works well - but when playing with it I noticed that currently
> edits are broken - they don't modify the data in the dive.
>
> This is not something that your patch broke, though. I'll need to figure
> out when that happened.
>
Dirk, t
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 15:30 +0200, Yosef Hamza wrote:
> Actually I tried to fix this one "#457" I guess week ago, I ended up
> with the exact same fix on the bug page, and I submitted it here on
> the mailing list questioning why it's not accepted before yet it was
> ack by Linus too.
>
> But got
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Miika Turkia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
>>
>> This works well - but when playing with it I noticed that currently
>> edits are broken - they don't modify the data in the dive.
>>
>> This is not something that your patch broke,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> This works well - but when playing with it I noticed that currently
> edits are broken - they don't modify the data in the dive.
>
> This is not something that your patch broke, though. I'll need to figure
> out when that happened.
>
bug #
This works well - but when playing with it I noticed that currently
edits are broken - they don't modify the data in the dive.
This is not something that your patch broke, though. I'll need to figure
out when that happened.
/D
___
subsurface mailing l
On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 20:59 +0200, Willem Ferguson wrote:
> On 11/04/2014 20:49, Luisa Pires wrote:
>
> > Willem,
> >
> >
> > I agree, if the graph is red, the graph in the button should be red
> > as well. I'm attaching the new version.
> >
> >
> > Regarding the last three..if they work kin
14 matches
Mail list logo
