Re: SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

2014-02-08 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
I don't mind removing the instance() classes, I created them that way so it was easyer to create them in the correct order ( meaning, no order at all :P ) On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Boris Barbulovski bbarbulov...@gmail.comwrote: An SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup. Main change is that now

Re: SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

2014-02-08 Thread Dirk Hohndel
class cleanup. Main change is that now SubsurfaceAbout doesn't have instance object, but it constructs and destructs dynamically. If small patch it's acceptable, and continue with this pattern by remove other instance() members

Re: SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

2014-02-08 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
the instance() classes, I created them that way so it was easyer to create them in the correct order ( meaning, no order at all :P ) On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Boris Barbulovski bbarbulov...@gmail.com wrote: An SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup. Main change

Re: SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

2014-02-08 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 08:50 +0100, Boris Barbulovski wrote: An SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup. Main change is that now SubsurfaceAbout doesn't have instance object, but it constructs and destructs dynamically. Based on Tomaz' ACK I have taken the patch... If small patch it's

SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

2014-02-07 Thread Boris Barbulovski
An SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup. Main change is that now SubsurfaceAbout doesn't have instance object, but it constructs and destructs dynamically. If small patch it's acceptable, and continue with this pattern by remove other instance() members(around 10). br, Boris.. From