On 10 March 2014 00:14, Robert C. Helling wrote:
>
> On 09 Mar 2014, at 19:46, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
>
>> ou could use LaTex, unless Robert hates it.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
>> "It is the de facto standard for the communication and publication of
>> scientific documents"
>>
>>
On 9 March 2014 20:20, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
>I have a small problem. Because we are dealing with calculus, I am not
> able to put them on an email. Can you suggest me a way of discussing things
> related to formulas etclike I'm not able to print specific characters
> for representing th
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> Gopichard,
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Gopichand Paturi <
> gopichandpat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomaz,
>> Actually I took that line from the website, I just copied and pasted it
>> here.
>> I just wanted to show Robert that
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Robert C. Helling wrote:
>
> On 09 Mar 2014, at 09:55, Gopichand Paturi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
> Hmm. That are two orders of magnitude for the radius which translates to
> six orders of magnitude for the volume. I would call that quite a range of
> values. IF
On 09 Mar 2014, at 09:55, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
Gopichand,
> So, as I went through the permeability theory I learnt that, solutions have
> inherently microbubbles called Nuclei of size[0.01MicroMeter-1Micrometer].
> that are at unstable equlibrium in every solution.
Hmm. That are two orders
Gopichard,
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
> Hi Tomaz,
> Actually I took that line from the website, I just copied and pasted it
> here.
> I just wanted to show Robert that line in the website which is needed in
> the conversation. That website data had that colour.
>
>
Hi Tomaz,
Actually I took that line from the website, I just copied and pasted it
here.
I just wanted to show Robert that line in the website which is needed in
the conversation. That website data had that colour.
Actually I did not know that would cause problems.
I will make sure I don't do that
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> Small development in my understanding.
>
> Please see this link
> http://www.deepocean.net/deepocean/index.php?science04.php
>
> In this if you actually go down the page where it's given to handle
> reformulated VPM,
> I see
Hi Robert,
Small development in my understanding.
Please see this link
http://www.deepocean.net/deepocean/index.php?science04.php
In this if you actually go down the page where it's given to handle
reformulated VPM,
I see that the initial radius is same across compartments is defined as
critical
Hi Robert (atdotde),
First of all I wanted to get clear on the initial radius of bubble to be
taken.
So, as I went through the permeability theory I learnt that, solutions have
inherently microbubbles called Nuclei of size[0.01MicroMeter-1Micrometer].
that are at unstable equlibrium in every solut
Hi Robert (atdotde),
Thanks for the reply.
Well I am a bit confused right now. Can you give me some kind of plan so
that I can proceed from now on.
What do you expect me to do further? Setting a direction for me to work on
would actually help.
I also need help regarding the Buhlmann algorithm sin
On 04 Mar 2014, at 19:50, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
Hi Gopichand,
> Well I would like to tell you my progress.
> First thing first let me tell you what I am familiarizing with.
>
very good, you have done a lot of reading.
> I am now first familiarizing myself with the "science part of decompre
On 03/04/2014 07:50 PM, Gopichand Paturi wrote:
Well I am not clear about one thing ...Is it past patterns and
experiences that drive decompression algorithms...or do we have explicit
theory that involves perfect calcualtions to form the decompression tables?
The theories on decompression are v
> "GP" == Gopichand Paturi writes:
>>> "DT" == David Tillotson writes:
DT> TBH, most decompression theories are just that. There are far
DT> too many variables to get a definitive algorithm. If you're
DT> really interested, I would suggest that you get hold of a copy
DT>
TBH, most decompression theories are just that. There are far too many
variables to get a definitive algorithm.
If you're really interested, I would suggest that you get hold of a copy of
"Deco for Divers" by Mark Powell (Aquapress ISBN 9781905492077). This covers
just about everything (includin
Hi Robert(atdotde),
Well I would like to tell you my progress.
First thing first let me tell you what I am familiarizing with.
I am now first familiarizing myself with the "science part of decompression"
My plan is that I will complete science part and later I want to involve
myself in Math part
Hi Robert(atdotde),
Well I would like to tell you my progress.
First thing first let me tell you what I am familiarizing with.
I am now first familiarizing myself with the "science part of decompression"
My plan is that I will complete science part and later I want to involve
myself in Math part
17 matches
Mail list logo
