Hi Robert,
On 5 July 2015 at 16:18, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
Hi Rick,
On 05 Jul 2015, at 01:41, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote:
0016-MOD-of-oxygen-at-pO2-of-1.6-is-20ft.patch
I am not really familiar with diving in imperial system but this patch
seems quite
On Jul 5, 2015, at 4:29 AM, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not really familiar with diving in imperial system but this patch seems
quite specific. Could somebody please check that this problem really only
affects the MOD of EAN100 and not other standard gases? I checked EAN50
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:27:23AM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote:
Hi,
Here is another pull request. I hope now it's better. Everything was
reorganized from scratch, the final code is almost the same.
I like the patches much better.
I agree with Robert that you could have squashed a couple
Hi Rick,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 08:39:15AM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
On 4 July 2015 at 23:42, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
We have macros to make this easier: M_OR_FT(3, 10) gives you the correct
value for 3m if the user has things set up for meters and 10ft if the user
is in
On 5 July 2015 at 19:36, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This week I was working on the following tasks:
- fixing issues from last week progress.
- adding TemplateEdit window.
- add custom.html template that is editable from subsurface.
- some minor fixes to existing
Hi,
On 05 Jul 2015, at 15:09, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
But what I've seen in diver training and in blender training (I'm a certified
trimix diver and trimix blender) is that you round to the nearest foot. Not
truncate.
I guess that is the best solution: Round to the nearest
These are the third series from Gehad. Not much is happening visually except
fixes for the print selected issue and the addition of the template editor
dialog. The template edit itself is WIP.
There is also the addition of the Preview window which we had in the previous
Qt implementation.
This
Dirk,
On 05 Jul 2015, at 18:45, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
So I just pushed a commit that adds a TestPlan test.
right now, I cannot pull it. Are you sure you pushed it?
I will sit down with the debugger tomorrow and try to find the origin of the
differences. Consider this as
On 5 Jul 2015 21:11, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
At the very least, split it up, and do the rounding separately. And
no, you shouldn't add roundto-1 unless you always want to round
_up_. I'd assume you'd want to round-to-nearest, and add roundto/2
instead.
I would
Hi there,
I spent this week doing some tests to find out the possible reasons
of some issues:
- first the QtSocketBluetooth::connectToService(address, uuid, mode)
doesn't work as expected. On some devices, the SPP profile is never found.
- second on some environments the connection takes too
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:03:09AM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Jul 2015 4:26 am, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Jul 2015, at 15:09, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
But what I've seen in diver training and in blender training (I'm a
certified
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
So rounding to 5m seems wrong - the typical stop depth are multiples of
3m/10ft.
Are they, though? At shallow depths, sure. But do metric divers really
prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m? That sounds odd. But I've never done
any
On 05-07-2015 22:48, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Are they, though? At shallow depths, sure. But do metric divers really
prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m? That sounds odd.
I sure do...
.. but maybe that's just me...
Pedro
___
subsurface mailing list
I forgot to specify that the Fedora 22 and ArchLinux environments
are two virtual machines. I don't know if this could cause the problem.
If it does, I expect that it shouldn't work with the HW OSTCs device as
well.
Claudiu
___
subsurface mailing list
Hi,
On 6 Jul 2015 7:42 am, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:03:09AM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Jul 2015 4:26 am, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
Hi,
On 05 Jul 2015, at 15:09, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
But what
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
static inline depth_t gas_mod(struct gasmix *mix, pressure_t po2_limit, int
roundto) {
depth_t depth;
depth.mm = ((po2_limit.mbar * 1000 / get_o2(mix) * 10 - 1) /
roundto) * roundto;
return
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 12:11:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
static inline depth_t gas_mod(struct gasmix *mix, pressure_t po2_limit, int
roundto) {
depth_t depth;
depth.mm = ((po2_limit.mbar * 1000 /
Hello everyone,This week, I managed the following:-- Adding a preferences dialog for the user to store cloud credentials.- Loading dives/Saving them to the cloud.- Displaying the dive profile in QML.This coming week, I will :-- Finish working on the dive profileand- Spend time on improving Android
On 6 Jul 2015 7:55 am, Pedro Neves nevesdi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05-07-2015 22:48, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Are they, though? At shallow depths, sure. But do metric divers really
prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m? That sounds odd.
I sure do...
.. but maybe that's just me...
We do in Australia
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 03:19:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Pedro Neves nevesdi...@gmail.com wrote:
But do metric divers really prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m?
I sure do...
.. but maybe that's just me...
The metric PADI tables do something odd, and go in
On 5 July 2015 23:19:52 BST, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Pedro Neves nevesdi...@gmail.com
wrote:
But do metric divers really prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m?
I sure do...
.. but maybe that's just me...
The metric PADI tables do something
Hi Grace
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 11:00:31PM +0300, Grace Karanja wrote:
This week, I managed the following:-
- Adding a preferences dialog for the user to store cloud credentials.
- Loading dives/Saving them to the cloud.
- Displaying the dive profile in QML.
Things looks nice, great
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Pedro Neves nevesdi...@gmail.com wrote:
But do metric divers really prefer 21m/24m to 20m/25m?
I sure do...
.. but maybe that's just me...
The metric PADI tables do something odd, and go in two-meter
increments from 10m to 22m, and then they switch to 5m
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 10:50:59PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
Hi there,
I spent this week doing some tests to find out the possible reasons
of some issues:
- first the QtSocketBluetooth::connectToService(address, uuid, mode)
doesn't work as expected. On some devices, the SPP profile is
I did pick one commit from your current devel branch (the build fix for
subsurface-mobile - while the subsurface-mobile in master isn't really
useful it made sense to have this fix in master).
And as it happens, that's our commit #1000 since 4.4.2
(actually, the way git describe counts this is a
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 11:25:41PM +0100, David Tillotson wrote:
The BSAC 88 tables work in 3m increments, as do the tables that ScotSAC
use IIRC. I guess most are a result of the original USN work.
Good data points. Is anyone aware of an organisation that teaches deco
stops that aren't on
26 matches
Mail list logo
