Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Jan Darowski
I think that currently first_stop is being calculated for each stop (so isn't actually first_stop) rather than just the first. That's what it looked like from my limited running under gdb with a break every time first_stop is calculated, and printing the depth variable. To calculate the

Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Walsh
On 17 August 2015 at 19:46, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote: I think that currently first_stop is being calculated for each stop (so isn't actually first_stop) rather than just the first. That's what it looked like from my limited running under gdb with a break every time

[PATCH] Explicit names in deco constant initialization

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
Make initialization of the deco parameters more explicit by using names for members. For VPM critical radii, I changed the values to V-Planner ones, as a patch by Jan will do this later anyway and will conflict with this patch anyway. Conflict resolution will this way only involve discarding

Re: Customizable prints progress

2015-08-17 Thread Gehad Elrobey
Hello Lubomir, As I am progressing with the documentation, I want to add description for users willing to write their own templates, so I will need to describe many concepts related to our defined css selectors, Grantlee names, etc. do you think it is relevant to add these details in the user

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Gehad Elrobey
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 17:06, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote: ATM, the plan for the statistics print is for it to

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Gehad Elrobey
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 16:16, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Willem Ferguson
On 17/08/2015 15:16, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can remember of the top of my head... Location management === The location management work turned into

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 17 August 2015 at 17:33, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 17:06, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov

at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can remember of the top of my head... Location management === The location management work turned into an utter disaster of many attempts that no

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Pedro Neves
On 17-08-2015 14:16, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can remember of the top of my head... User manual === That needs massive work for all the amazing features

Re: building on a Mac

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:35:26AM +0200, Guido Lerch wrote: Hi Dirk, Thanks for all your efforts. I though it might be useful to protocol on how I uninstalled what you listed below. What is kind of frustrating is that when removing QT with the maintenance tool, which is what they

Re: building on a Mac

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:03:41PM +0200, Guido Lerch wrote: Will do, Thanks Tried this morning to get an Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop up and SubSurface installed as per INSTALL file. :-) worked like a charm with a few hick-up’s Using apt-get as suggested works but some get’s failed. I ran a

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 17 August 2015 at 16:16, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can remember of the top of my head... Printing Printing seems to be fairly close

Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Jan Darowski
I think I've worked out at least one difference in the programs' algorithms, and sorry I doubt you'll like it. Subsurface calculates required stops considering the ascent rate and the time to reach the stop. The Fortran program calculates the 'instantaneous' ceiling, i.e. the depth

Re: building on a Mac

2015-08-17 Thread Guido Lerch
Will do, Tried this morning to get an Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop up and SubSurface installed as per INSTALL file. :-) worked like a charm with a few hick-up’s Using apt-get as suggested works but some get’s failed. I ran a sudo apt-get update and then again a sudo apt-get sudo apt-get install git g++

Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Walsh
On 18 Aug 2015 12:13 am, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote: I think I've worked out at least one difference in the programs' algorithms, and sorry I doubt you'll like it. Subsurface calculates required stops considering the ascent rate and the time to reach the stop. The Fortran

Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Walsh
Hi Jan, On 17 August 2015 at 20:59, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 19:46, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote: I think that currently first_stop is being calculated for each stop (so isn't actually first_stop) rather than just the first. That's what it

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 17 August 2015 at 17:06, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com wrote: ATM, the plan for the statistics print is for it to have a single-template design (no delete, import/export, only edit) due to

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Willem Ferguson willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za wrote: On 17/08/2015 15:16, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I've been saying this for a while now. But I'd like to actually try and make this happen sooner rather than later... So here's what I can remember of the top of

Re: [PATCH] Fix MKVI erroneous sample time

2015-08-17 Thread Miika Turkia
And of course I forgot a small but important bit of data from the commit message On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com wrote: There was a bug in MKVI download tool that resulted in erroneous sample times. This fix takes care of that and should work similarly as

planner / VPM-B patches

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
I think I have most of this applied and pushed now - but I'm not sure. There were some patches from Rick and some other strays here and there that I wasn't quite sure what to do with. Also, there were several conflicts when applying Jan's and Robert's patches. I'd appreciate if Robert / Jan /

Re: planner / VPM-B patches

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Walsh
On 18 August 2015 at 15:23, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: I think I have most of this applied and pushed now - but I'm not sure. There were some patches from Rick and some other strays here and there that I wasn't quite sure what to do with. Those patches of mine are obsolete and can

[PATCH] Fix MKVI erroneous sample time

2015-08-17 Thread Miika Turkia
There was a bug in MKVI download tool that resulted in erroneous sample times. This fix takes care of that and should work similarly as the vendor's own. Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com --- file.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Jan Darowski wrote: 2015-08-17 17:54 GMT+02:00 Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de: Hi, On 17 Aug 2015, at 15:44, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote: Which approach is more justified? Debatable. The method used by Subsurface should be

[PATCH]Cast to stop compiler warning.

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
From e77bec30c802af34782414bfa5ee382c1acf6e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:29:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Explicit cast to stop compiler warning Signed-off-by: Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de --- git-access.c | 2 +- 1 file

Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
DIrk, On 15 Aug 2015, at 16:11, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote: Here is my next pull request, this is definitely progress and nothing is obviously wrong (modulo what was said in this thread, so please pull: ACK by me. There are some things to work on, but this gets easier, once

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
Regarding to grantlee - I started reading it's source code but didn't managed to advance much - will keep trying. also, I'm in contact with grantlee developer to make things easier. tomaz ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

[PATCH] Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
Hi,On 17 Aug 2015, at 15:44, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote:Which approach is more justified? Debatable. The method used by Subsurface should be 'better', but when the depth of the first stop/ceiling is given a special significance thanks to the Boyles law compensation process, I'm not so

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
On 17 Aug 2015, at 18:41, Jan Darowski jan.darow...@gmail.com wrote: In my opinion we shouldn't leave this as a preference, it's to technical and complicated to explain to most of users. We have the conservatism levels already, so users can manipulate how aggressive their schedule is.

Re: at some point we need to release Subsurface 4.5

2015-08-17 Thread Claudiu Olteanu
Bluetooth support = BT support is looking fairly good on Linux and making progress on Windows, I think, but I'm sure there are tons of small issues lurking here and there. Has anyone gotten it to work on Mac, yet? Claudiu / Thiago - do you have a TODO list? The patches

Re: [PATCH] Parse erroneous sample time for MK6

2015-08-17 Thread Miika Turkia
I got a confirmation that this is a bug in an old version of their download tool. Should be fixed by a firmware update and updated PC tool. I am still verifying some details before sending a new patch according to the vendors suggestion. (A bit less accurate than my current one, but probably more

[PATCH] Solve both cubics analytically

2015-08-17 Thread Robert C. Helling
Hi, here is the promised analytic solution for the cubic in update_gradient(). Turns out, we can use the same code as calc_inner_pressure(), so it can be factored out. To be applied after Jan’s latest patches. Best Robert From a69b57ef979eab3553b5e2be0c2559c7e6dcb0a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

2015-08-17 Thread Jan Darowski
2015-08-17 17:54 GMT+02:00 Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de: Hi, On 17 Aug 2015, at 15:44, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote: Which approach is more justified? Debatable. The method used by Subsurface should be 'better', but when the depth of the first stop/ceiling is given a

Re: Customizable prints progress

2015-08-17 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 16 August 2015 at 16:49, Gehad Elrobey gehadelro...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov neolit...@gmail.com so this is a Qt 5.3 issue and on such older versions the page page calculation will be slightly off and the white pixels will appear - am i right?

Re: building on a Mac

2015-08-17 Thread Guido Lerch
Hi Dirk, Thanks for all your efforts. I though it might be useful to protocol on how I uninstalled what you listed below. What is kind of frustrating is that when removing QT with the maintenance tool, which is what they recommend, certain traces in the /usr/local/ folder remain from which a