On Aug 27, 2015, at 07:17, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
I'd love to fix those. Can you point them out to me? When first setting
things up I did a few test installs in VMs and all seemed to work fine.
But I never tried to build the source rpms, to be honest.
I'm hoping
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:08:03AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le 27/08/2015 05:33, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So quite frankly, the fact that Debian people now attack Dirk, who has
been bending over backwards over these kinds of
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:50:08PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
For some reason, again I couldn't apply your patch with git so I had to
test it manually.
What this could mean is that your sources are out of sync with master.
Robert's patch applied cleanly here.
/D
From c835cb7b0ee63b664a387af8dd059bccd8ab60e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:27:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Rename variable to better reflect what it does
The pressure for the Boyle compensation is of the first ceiling,
i.e. the ceiling
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is
These were left unused by cleaning up the import function parameters.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
file.c | 84 --
1 file changed, 84 deletions(-)
diff --git a/file.c b/file.c
index cd3d3ca..19d708f 100644
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface
Robert,
On 27 August 2015 at 22:26, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de wrote:
let me add to this confusion: In my branch, I had computed the first stop
depth for each round of the CVA, as done in this patch:
I don't know this does add to confusion. It suggests that doing the
Continuing the crusade against excessive number of parameters for some
functions. This should be the last of the import functions to be cleaned
up.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
dive.h| 2 +-
file.c| 28 +++--
Rick,On 27 Aug 2015, at 00:39, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote:^^^This last line changes the calculated plan but I don't know why. I have attached the results of the test run twice: firstly with the current master (80e7213582c203a128270a0e2e8fcc850eede063), the second with the line
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
I know that Linus uses gmail for patches - is there a trick, Linus?
Look out for CR's at the end of lines. If you save things using save
original from the web interface, you get line endings with CR/LF even
on unix. They
Oh :). I thought about it but I don't know why I forgot to ask you.
So it is also my mistake.
Let me know if it works or if you encounter other problems.
Claudiu
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
On Aug 27, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Rick Walsh rickmwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 Aug 2015 12:04 am, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org
mailto:d...@hohndel.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:50:08PM +1000, Rick Walsh wrote:
For some reason, again I couldn't apply your patch with git so I had to
OK, deleting the plist file, shutting the system down and restarting
worked. BT is alive and well again. Here's what Subsurface reports:
The local Bluetooth adapter cannot be accessed.
So this indicated that in
BtDeviceSelectionDialog::updateLocalDeviceInformation()
localDevice-isValid()
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:12:12PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
OK, deleting the plist file, shutting the system down and restarting
worked. BT is alive and well again. Here's what Subsurface reports:
The local Bluetooth adapter cannot be accessed.
So this indicated that in
On Aug 26, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Claudiu Olteanu
olteanu.vasilica.clau...@gmail.com wrote:
Bluetooth support
=
BT support is looking fairly good on Linux and making progress on Windows,
I think, but I'm sure there are tons of small issues lurking here and
there.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:57:34AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Aug 26, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Claudiu Olteanu
olteanu.vasilica.clau...@gmail.com wrote:
Bluetooth support
=
BT support is looking fairly good on Linux and making progress on
Windows,
I
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:29:27AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:12:12PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
OK, deleting the plist file, shutting the system down and restarting
worked. BT is alive and well again. Here's what Subsurface reports:
The local Bluetooth
Yes, I promised something
Em qui, 27 de ago de 2015 15:40, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:46:03PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
Oh :). I thought about it but I don't know why I forgot to ask you.
So it is also my mistake.
Let me know if it works or if
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:46:03PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
Oh :). I thought about it but I don't know why I forgot to ask you.
So it is also my mistake.
Let me know if it works or if you encounter other problems.
Nope, BT seems to work. Don't have a BT divecomputer around right now,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:46:03PM +0300, Claudiu Olteanu wrote:
Oh :). I thought about it but I don't know why I forgot to ask you.
So it is also my mistake.
Let me know if it works or if you encounter other problems.
LOADS of other problems trying to get my rebuild to do what I want it to
Sent from the wrong account, please disregard the previous mail.
Best regards,
Guido Lerch
m: +41 79 3217739
Quality means building the customer¹s point of view into every aspect of a
product from design to final recycling.
From: Guido Lerch guido.le...@perkinelmer.com
Date: Thursday 27
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:31:02PM +, Lerch, Guido wrote:
Hi Dirk,
I did not follow this closely but how much time do I have to fix the Uemis
implementation.
I make nice progress but since I am doing this besides my job, like propably
all, I would need a few days more.
I expect a
-Original Message-
From: subsurface [mailto:subsurface-boun...@subsurface-divelog.org] On Behalf
Of Dirk Hohndel
Sent: Wednesday, 26 August 2015 7:14 AM
To: Subsurface Mailing List subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org; Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Cloud storage
Dear list,
I've noticed what looks to me like artifacts regarding the ceiling VPM
calculates for multilevel dives. See the attached screenshot.
Basically, during manually entered ascent segments, the calculated
ceiling becomes deeper as the diver goes shallower...
It might just be a well-known
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 06:50:20 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
And then there is Linux. 1/5th of the number of users that Windows has
(for Subsurface). Even though on Windows there are tons of alternatives
and on Linux there's nothing else. And we have all the developers here
mixed into those
Hi Gaetan,
On 28 Aug 2015 1:32 pm, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dear list,
I've noticed what looks to me like artifacts regarding the ceiling VPM
calculates for multilevel dives. See the attached screenshot.
Basically, during manually entered ascent segments, the calculated
On Aug 27, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dear list,
I've noticed what looks to me like artifacts regarding the ceiling VPM
calculates for multilevel dives. See the attached screenshot.
Basically, during manually entered ascent segments, the calculated
Bluetooth support
=
BT support is looking fairly good on Linux and making progress on
Windows,
I think, but I'm sure there are tons of small issues lurking here and
there. Has anyone gotten it to work on Mac, yet?
Also ready for Beta 1, except for OS X where it also doesn't
Le 27/08/2015 05:33, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So quite frankly, the fact that Debian people now attack Dirk, who has
been bending over backwards over these kinds of stupidities, is not a
big surprise. I think it's in the Debian DNA to
Hi,
Le 26/08/2015 13:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
Well apparently subsurface is now targeted towards Win/Mac[0] (no
binaries for Linux)... so the experience for FLOSS users will simply
be that there is no subsurface anymore.
No, we have binaries available for Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSUSE,
On Thursday 27 August 2015 09:29:27 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Hmm - my binary is linked against QtBluetooth but there doesn't even
appear to BE a QtConnectivity in Qt on my Mac...
I see you've already fixed it but...
QtBluetooth is a Qt module, so you'll have libQt5Bluetooth.so,
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 17:40:28 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
I don’t know anything about CentOS, but these days I happen to build
subsurface on Macs which only have homebrew which should be much more
basic
than any Linux distribution package manager. But here, I just have to
install a few
34 matches
Mail list logo
