Hi everybody,
> On 12.04.2016, at 16:35, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> As for the development process, right now I consider this the "storming" phase
A quick report from my side: Since that was easiest, I got hold of a RPi3
(which has both wifi and BT on board) to get started with something (and not
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:36:37PM +0100, JB2Cool wrote:
> >
> > Did I miss something but why the need for this box at all? (Sorry if this
> > has been covered previously)
>
> DiveMate (http://www.divemate.de/) seem to do exactly what I think you are
> trying to with either a USB or IR dongle, sur
And now I have read the notes about iRDA computers on OS X and Win10.
Ignore me, late to the party as always.
JB
On 12 April 2016 at 18:36, JB2Cool wrote:
> Did I miss something but why the need for this box at all? (Sorry if this
>> has been covered previously)
>
>
> DiveMate (http://www.divem
>
> Did I miss something but why the need for this box at all? (Sorry if this
> has been covered previously)
DiveMate (http://www.divemate.de/) seem to do exactly what I think you are
trying to with either a USB or IR dongle, sure their dongle is a bit
expensive but it at least proves that a hard
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:55:54PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> >>
> >> A Poll would be the proper way to select this.
> >
> > You must be new here :-)
>
> Absolutely ;)
There will be no poll for the name :-)
> Lets first select if we want to do BT or WiFi. I am partially leaning to
> BT, but
On 2016-04-12 18:42, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
The device:
* a name ("OnSurface" ? :)
>>>
>>> Subsurface Box
>>>
>>> But of course this is open to discussion :-)
>>
>> I am not one to do a long bikeshed.
>>
>> A Poll would be the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> >> The device:
> >> * a name ("OnSurface" ? :)
> >
> > Subsurface Box
> >
> > But of course this is open to discussion :-)
>
> I am not one to do a long bikeshed.
>
> A Poll would be the proper way to select this.
You must be new
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:35:54PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Dienstag, 12. April 2016 07:58:04 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> > What I suggested to them is that CHIP should ship with an open
> > WiFi access point running and a web server to connect to and
> > then a simple web interface whe
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:20:28PM +0300, Miika Turkia wrote:
> > * Dive Computer connectivity
> > - USB Host to Dive Computer
> > - USB<->IRDA connector support
> > - others?
> > Likely USB is the minimum, and that then things can plug
> > into it that actually connect to the DC.
> >
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> (google is not very friendly for searching for "chip" btw...)
https://www.google.com/search?q=c.h.i.p.+computer
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurfac
On 2016-04-12 16:58, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
[..]
>> Hence the best way to go is to just use the packaging system of the
>> distro that gets chosen.
>
> So the CHIP uses a Debian based system. But as I said in my last two
> emails, exposing that to end users is already declaring defeat.
Indeed, hence
On Dienstag, 12. April 2016 07:58:04 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> What I suggested to them is that CHIP should ship with an open
> WiFi access point running and a web server to connect to and
> then a simple web interface where you enter a URL from which
> a package is then installed. Super easy for
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 5:16 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> * Dive Computer connectivity
> - USB Host to Dive Computer
> - USB<->IRDA connector support
> - others?
> Likely USB is the minimum, and that then things can plug
> into it tha
"rm -f" is a bit shorter :)
Cheers,
Henrik
--
Sent from my phone
12. apr. 2016 16.57 skrev "Miika Turkia" :
> Running subsurface/packaging/android/build.sh after deleting
> subsurface-mobile-build-arm directory fails for me due to missing
> ssrf-version.h file. Thus we should only delete it if i
Am 12.04.2016 um 16:36 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2016, at 4:53 AM, Martin Gysel wrote:
>>> The other thing is deployment. Initially, that’s simple, we provide disk
>>> images. But then, what is the upgrade path? Connect to wifi and do git
>>> pull? apt-get upgrade/update? Get a new di
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 5:16 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-12 11:53, Robert Helling wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been thinking a bit more about setting up a small device
>> (C.H.I.P. or similar) to do the dive computer read out and communication
>> with the mobile device.
>>
>> One thing
Having build number as mandatory parameter seems unnecessary, thus
setting default value (used for andoird:versionCode) to 0.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia
---
packaging/android/build.sh | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/packaging/android/build.sh b/packaging/android/build.sh
i
Running subsurface/packaging/android/build.sh after deleting
subsurface-mobile-build-arm directory fails for me due to missing
ssrf-version.h file. Thus we should only delete it if it actually
exists.
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia
---
packaging/android/build.sh | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 inserti
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 4:53 AM, Martin Gysel wrote:
>> The other thing is deployment. Initially, that’s simple, we provide disk
>> images. But then, what is the upgrade path? Connect to wifi and do git
>> pull? apt-get upgrade/update? Get a new disk image? That needs to be
>> thought about as well
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 2:53 AM, Robert Helling wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking a bit more about setting up a small device (C.H.I.P. or
> similar) to do the dive computer read out and communication with the mobile
> device.
>
> One thing I am worried about is how to collaboratively dev
On 12/04/2016 13:53, Martin Gysel wrote:
I think it depends on the used base. if it's a debian based system (and
I would start with such a system), then providing a apt-get urls seems
to be the easiest solution. if using a leaner base (e.g. to reduce
startup time as much as possible) then flas
On 2016-04-12 11:53, Robert Helling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking a bit more about setting up a small device
> (C.H.I.P. or similar) to do the dive computer read out and communication
> with the mobile device.
>
> One thing I am worried about is how to collaboratively develop for such
> a
It is deployed and working fine.
Thanks!
Guillaume
Le 11/04/2016 15:10, Dirk Hohndel a écrit :
sorry, script fell over its feet. It's building now
/D
On Apr 11, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi Dirk,
Subsurface is still at 4.5.4 on OBS. Could you update it, please?
Guilla
Am 12.04.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Robert Helling:
> Hi,
>
> I have been thinking a bit more about setting up a small device
> (C.H.I.P. or similar) to do the dive computer read out and communication
> with the mobile device.
>
> One thing I am worried about is how to collaboratively develop for such
24 matches
Mail list logo